Literature DB >> 2269730

Effects of stimulus level on forward-masked psychophysical tuning curves in quiet and in noise.

D A Nelson1, S J Chargo, J G Kopun, R L Freyman.   

Abstract

Forward-masked psychophysical tuning curves were obtained from normal-hearing listeners at different probe levels in quiet and in a broadband background noise. In quiet, tuning-curve shape changed with probe level. For six listeners, tuning curves became broader with increasing probe level, primarily due to a decrease in the low-frequency slopes. For one listener, tuning curves became narrower with increasing probe level. The addition of a background noise, which was presented continuously at a level 10 dB below the noise level required to mask the probe tone, reduced the masker levels required to mask the probe tone. The reduction was greater near the tip of the tuning curve than on the tail, so that tuning curves in background noise were narrower than those obtained in quiet. Tuning curves with comparable masker levels near the tip of the tuning curve (Lmtip) were similar in shape, regardless of probe level or whether tuning curves were obtained in quiet or noise. Comparisons of tuning-curve characteristics derived by fitting tuning curves with least-squares procedures, indicated that low-frequency slopes decreased with Lmtip. As a consequence, Q10 dB values decreased with Lmtip. These results are consistent with the interpretation that tuning-curve shapes are determined by the intensities of the maskers required to mask the probe tone. The addition of a background noise restricted (partially masked) the excitation pattern of the probe so that lower masker intensities were required to "forward mask" the probe tone, and narrower tuning curves resulted from less intense markers. The results are well described by a two-process model of auditory excitation patterns.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2269730     DOI: 10.1121/1.400111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  6 in total

1.  Effects of background noise level on behavioral estimates of basilar-membrane compression.

Authors:  Melanie J Gregan; Peggy B Nelson; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Auditory-filter characteristics for listeners with real and simulated hearing impairment.

Authors:  Joseph G Desloge; Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida; Zachary D Perez; Lorraine A Delhorne
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2012-03

3.  Level dependence of auditory filters in nonsimultaneous masking as a function of frequency.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Andrea M Simonson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Auditory filter tuning inferred with short sinusoidal and notched-noise maskers.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Rapid measurement of auditory filter shape in mice using the auditory brainstem response and notched noise.

Authors:  Ioan A Lina; Amanda M Lauer
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  The influence of probe level on the tuning of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions and behavioral test in human.

Authors:  Yao Wang; Qin Gong; Tao Zhang
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 2.819

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.