Literature DB >> 11108372

Frequency selectivity as a function of level and frequency measured with uniformly exciting notched noise.

B R Glasberg1, B C Moore.   

Abstract

Thresholds for detecting sinusoidal signals were measured as a function of the spectral width of a notch in a noise masker. The notch was positioned both symmetrically and asymmetrically around the signal frequency. The noise was designed to create equal excitation per ERB within its passbands (uniformly exciting noise), after allowing for the transfer function of the headphone and the middle ear. For a signal frequency of 250 Hz, the level per ERB ranged from 35 to 80 dB in 15-dB steps. For signal frequencies of 500, 1,000, 2,000, and 4,000 Hz, the level per ERB ranged from 40 to 70 dB per ERB in 15-dB steps. Auditory filter shapes were derived from the data by modeling the auditory filter as the sum of a sharply tuned tip filter and a broader tail filter. The gain of the tip filter was assumed to be a function of level. The shape of the tip filter and the gain and shape of the tail filter were assumed to be level independent. The data for all levels were fitted simultaneously. The data were fitted best when the gain of the tip filter was assumed to be a function of the signal level (as opposed to the masker level per ERB). The filter shapes showed a level dependence that qualitatively resembled the level dependence of filtering on the basilar membrane. The maximum gain of the tip filter tended to increase with increasing center frequency up to 1 kHz, but to remain roughly constant for higher frequencies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11108372     DOI: 10.1121/1.1315291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  48 in total

1.  The effect of sound intensity on the frequency resolving power of hearing and the effect of interference.

Authors:  A Ya Supin; V V Popov; O N Milekhina; M B Tarakanov
Journal:  Dokl Biol Sci       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr

2.  Estimates of human cochlear tuning at low levels using forward and simultaneous masking.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-07-10

3.  Isoresponse versus isoinput estimates of cochlear filter tuning.

Authors:  Almudena Eustaquio-Martín; Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-11-23

4.  Phase effects on the perceived elevation of complex tones.

Authors:  William M Hartmann; Virginia Best; Johahn Leung; Simon Carlile
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Using individual differences to test the role of temporal and place cues in coding frequency modulation.

Authors:  Kelly L Whiteford; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  Some problems in the measurement of the frequency-resolving ability of hearing.

Authors:  A Ya Supin
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-10

7.  Level dependence of auditory filters in nonsimultaneous masking as a function of frequency.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Andrea M Simonson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 8.  Basic auditory processes involved in the analysis of speech sounds.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  The relationship between precursor level and the temporal effect.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Speech identification based on temporal fine structure cues.

Authors:  Stanley Sheft; Marine Ardoint; Christian Lorenzi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.