Literature DB >> 16454296

Influence of primary-level and primary-frequency ratios on human distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Tiffany A Johnson1, Stephen T Neely, Cassie A Garner, Michael P Gorga.   

Abstract

The combined influence of primary-level differences (L1-L2) and primary-frequency ratio (f2/f1) on distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) level was investigated in 20 normal-hearing subjects. DPOAEs were recorded with continuously varying stimulus levels [Neely et al. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117, 1248-1259 (2005)] for the following stimulus conditions: f2= 1, 2, 4, and 8 kHz and f2/f1=1.05 to 1.4; various L1-L2, including one individually optimized to produce the largest DPOAE. For broadly spaced primary frequencies at low L2 levels, the largest DPOAEs were recorded when L1 was much higher than L2, with L1 remaining relatively constant as L2 increased. As f2/fl decreased, the largest DPOAEs were observed when L1 was closer to L2 and increased as L2 increased. Optimal values for L1-L2 and f2 f1 were derived from these data. In general, average DPOAE levels for the new L1-L2 and f2/f1 were equivalent to or larger than those observed for other stimulus combinations, including the L1-L2 described by Kummer et al. [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103, 3431-3444 (1998)] and those defined by Neely et al. in which L1-L2 was evaluated, but f2/f1 was fixed at 1.2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16454296      PMCID: PMC2440916          DOI: 10.1121/1.2133714

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  42 in total

1.  Frequency dependence of acoustic distortion products in a locally active model of the cochlea.

Authors:  L J Kanis; E de Boer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  A behavioral measure of basilar-membrane nonlinearity in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  A J Oxenham; C J Plack
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Dependence of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions on primary levels in normal and impaired ears. I. Effects of decreasing L2 below L1.

Authors:  M L Whitehead; M J McCoy; B L Lonsbury-Martin; G K Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of ear-canal standing waves on measurements of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  M L Whitehead; B B Stagner; B L Lonsbury-Martin; G K Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Sound calibration and distortion product otoacoustic emissions at high frequencies.

Authors:  J H Siegel; E T Hirohata
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  From laboratory to clinic: a large scale study of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in ears with normal hearing and ears with hearing loss.

Authors:  M P Gorga; S T Neely; B Ohlrich; B Hoover; J Redner; J Peters
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Mechanical responses to two-tone distortion products in the apical and basal turns of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  N P Cooper; W S Rhode
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Toward optimizing the clinical utility of distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements.

Authors:  L Stover; M P Gorga; S T Neely; D Montoya
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Dependence of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions on primary levels in normal and impaired ears. II. Asymmetry in L1,L2 space.

Authors:  M L Whitehead; B B Stagner; M J McCoy; B L Lonsbury-Martin; G K Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Acoustic distortion products (ADP) from the ears of term infants and young adults using low stimulus levels.

Authors:  A M Brown; S L Sheppard; P T Russell
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1994 Aug-Oct
View more
  30 in total

1.  Influence of calibration method on distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements: I. test performance.

Authors:  Sienna R Burke; Abigail R Rogers; Stephen T Neely; Judy G Kopun; Hongyang Tan; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Reducing reflected contributions to ear-canal distortion product otoacoustic emissions in humans.

Authors:  Tiffany A Johnson; Stephen T Neely; Judy G Kopun; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Distortion product otoacoustic emissions: cochlear-source contributions and clinical test performance.

Authors:  Tiffany A Johnson; Stephen T Neely; Judy G Kopun; Darcia M Dierking; Hongyang Tan; Connie Converse; Elizabeth Kennedy; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Comparing the optimal signal conditions for recording cubic and quadratic distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Lin Bian; Shixiong Chen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Relation of distortion-product otoacoustic emission input-output functions to loudness.

Authors:  Daniel M Rasetshwane; Stephen T Neely; Judy G Kopun; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Influence of stimulus parameters on amplitude-modulated stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Tiffany A Johnson; Laura Beshaler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Low-frequency and high-frequency distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression in humans.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely; Darcia M Dierking; Judy Kopun; Kristin Jolkowski; Kristin Groenenboom; Hongyang Tan; Bettina Stiegemann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Low-frequency and high-frequency cochlear nonlinearity in humans.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely; Darcia M Dierking; Judy Kopun; Kristin Jolkowski; Kristin Groenenboom; Hongyang Tan; Bettina Stiegemann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Growth of suppression in humans based on distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely; Judy Kopun; Hongyang Tan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Distribution of standing-wave errors in real-ear sound-level measurements.

Authors:  Susan A Richmond; Judy G Kopun; Stephen T Neely; Hongyang Tan; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.