Literature DB >> 16838533

Reducing reflected contributions to ear-canal distortion product otoacoustic emissions in humans.

Tiffany A Johnson1, Stephen T Neely, Judy G Kopun, Michael P Gorga.   

Abstract

Distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) fine structure has been attributed to the interaction of two cochlear-source mechanisms (distortion and reflection sources). A suppressor presented near the 2f1-f2 frequency reduces the reflection-source contribution and, therefore, DPOAE fine structure. Optimal relationships between stimulus and suppressor conditions, however, have not been described. In this study, the relationship between suppressor level (L3) and stimulus level (L2) was evaluated to determine the L3 that was most effective at reducing fine structure. Subjects were initially screened to find individuals who produced DPOAE fine structure. A difference in the prevalence of fine structure in two frequency intervals was observed. At 2 kHz, 11 of 12 subjects exhibited fine structure, as compared to 5 of 22 subjects at 4 kHz. Only subjects demonstrating fine structure participated in subsequent measurements. DPOAE responses were evaluated in 1/3-octave intervals centered at 2 or 4 kHz, with 4 subjects contributing data at each interval. Multiple L3's were evaluated for each L2, which ranged from 20 to 80 dB SPL. The results indicated that one or more L3's at each L2 were roughly equally effective at reducing DPOAE fine structure. However, no single L3 was effective at all L2's in every subject.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16838533      PMCID: PMC2536772          DOI: 10.1121/1.2200048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  28 in total

1.  Evidence for the distortion product frequency place as a source of distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) fine structure in humans. I. Fine structure and higher-order DPOAE as a function of the frequency ratio f2/f1.

Authors:  M Mauermann; S Uppenkamp; P W van Hengel; B Kollmeier
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Distortion-product source unmixing: a test of the two-mechanism model for DPOAE generation.

Authors:  R Kalluri; C A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The use of distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression as an estimate of response growth.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely; Patricia A Dorn; Dawn Konrad-Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Sources of distortion product otoacoustic emissions revealed by suppression experiments and inverse fast Fourier transforms in normal ears.

Authors:  D Konrad-Martin; S T Neely; D H Keefe; P A Dorn; M P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Weighted DPOAE input/output-functions: a tool for automatic assessment of hearing loss in clinical application.

Authors:  Johann A Oswald; Thomas Janssen
Journal:  Z Med Phys       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.820

6.  Wave and place fixed DPOAE maps of the human ear.

Authors:  R D Knight; D T Kemp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Cochlear generation of intermodulation distortion revealed by DPOAE frequency functions in normal and impaired ears.

Authors:  L J Stover; S T Neely; M P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Sources of DPOAEs revealed by suppression experiments, inverse fast Fourier transforms, and SFOAEs in impaired ears.

Authors:  Dawn Konrad-Martin; Stephen T Neely; Douglas H Keefe; Patricia A Dorn; Emily Cyr; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Pure-tone threshold estimation from extrapolated distortion product otoacoustic emission I/O-functions in normal and cochlear hearing loss ears.

Authors:  Paul Boege; Thomas Janssen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Further efforts to predict pure-tone thresholds from distortion product otoacoustic emission input/output functions.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely; Patricia A Dorn; Brenda M Hoover
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  [Sound and velocity DPOAEs : Technology, methodology and perspectives].

Authors:  E Dalhoff; A Vetesník; D Turcanu; A W Gummer
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Distortion product otoacoustic emissions: cochlear-source contributions and clinical test performance.

Authors:  Tiffany A Johnson; Stephen T Neely; Judy G Kopun; Darcia M Dierking; Hongyang Tan; Connie Converse; Elizabeth Kennedy; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Relation of distortion-product otoacoustic emission input-output functions to loudness.

Authors:  Daniel M Rasetshwane; Stephen T Neely; Judy G Kopun; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Distortion product otoacoustic emission phase and component analysis in human newborns.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Breaking away: violation of distortion emission phase-frequency invariance at low frequencies.

Authors:  Sumitrajit Dhar; Abigail Rogers; Carolina Abdala
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Do "optimal" conditions improve distortion product otoacoustic emission test performance?

Authors:  Benjamin J Kirby; Judy G Kopun; Hongyang Tan; Stephen T Neely; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Low-frequency modulation of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in humans.

Authors:  Lin Bian; Nicole M Scherrer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Sources of variability in distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Cassie A Garner; Stephen T Neely; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Fine structure of distortion product otoacoustic emissions: its dependence on age and hearing threshold and clinical implications.

Authors:  Wolfgang Wagner; Peter K Plinkert; Reinhard Vonthein; Stefan K Plontke
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Reliability of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions and their relation to loudness.

Authors:  Megan J Thorson; Judy G Kopun; Stephen T Neely; Hongyang Tan; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.482

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.