Literature DB >> 23862814

Relation of distortion-product otoacoustic emission input-output functions to loudness.

Daniel M Rasetshwane1, Stephen T Neely, Judy G Kopun, Michael P Gorga.   

Abstract

The aim of this study is to further explore the relationship between distortion-product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) measurements and categorical loudness scaling (CLS) measurements using multiple linear regression (MLR) analysis. Recently, Thorson et al. [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 131, 1282-1295 (2012)] obtained predictions of CLS loudness ratings from DPOAE input/output (I/O) functions using MLR analysis. The present study extends that work by (1) considering two different (and potentially improved) MLR models, one for predicting loudness rating at specified input level and the other for predicting the input level for each loudness category and (2) validating the new models' predictions using an independent set of data. Strong correlations were obtained between predicted and measured data during the validation process with overall root-mean-square errors in the range 10.43-16.78 dB for the prediction of CLS input level, supporting the view that DPOAE I/O measurements can predict CLS loudness ratings and input levels, and thus may be useful for fitting hearing aids.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23862814      PMCID: PMC3724751          DOI: 10.1121/1.4807560

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  37 in total

1.  Cochlear compression estimates from measurements of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Stephen T Neely; Michael P Gorga; Patricia A Dorn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Weighted DPOAE input/output-functions: a tool for automatic assessment of hearing loss in clinical application.

Authors:  Johann A Oswald; Thomas Janssen
Journal:  Z Med Phys       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.820

3.  Similarity in loudness and distortion product otoacoustic emission input/output functions: implications for an objective hearing aid adjustment.

Authors:  Jörg Müller; Thomas Janssen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Loudness growth in 1/2-octave bands (LGOB)--a procedure for the assessment of loudness.

Authors:  J B Allen; J L Hall; P S Jeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  Outer hair cell electromotility and otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  W E Brownell
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Is loudness simply proportional to the auditory nerve spike count?

Authors:  E M Relkin; J R Doucet
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Pure-tone threshold estimation from extrapolated distortion product otoacoustic emission I/O-functions in normal and cochlear hearing loss ears.

Authors:  Paul Boege; Thomas Janssen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Distortion product otoacoustic emission input/output functions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired human ears.

Authors:  P A Dorn; D Konrad-Martin; S T Neely; D H Keefe; E Cyr; M P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  A revised model of loudness perception applied to cochlear hearing loss.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore; Brian R Glasberg
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Further efforts to predict pure-tone thresholds from distortion product otoacoustic emission input/output functions.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely; Patricia A Dorn; Brenda M Hoover
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  7 in total

1.  Effects of relative and absolute frequency in the spectral weighting of loudness.

Authors:  Suyash Narendra Joshi; Marcin Wróblewski; Kendra K Schmid; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Influence of suppression on restoration of spectral loudness summation in listeners with hearing loss.

Authors:  Daniel M Rasetshwane; Robin R High; Judy G Kopun; Stephen T Neely; Michael P Gorga; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Categorical loudness scaling and equal-loudness contours in listeners with normal hearing and hearing loss.

Authors:  Daniel M Rasetshwane; Andrea C Trevino; Jessa N Gombert; Lauren Liebig-Trehearn; Judy G Kopun; Walt Jesteadt; Stephen T Neely; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Individual Differences in Behavioural Decision Weights Related to Irregularities in Cochlear Mechanics.

Authors:  Jungmee Lee; Inseok Heo; An-Chieh Chang; Kristen Bond; Christophe Stoelinga; Robert Lutfi; Glenis Long
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.622

5.  Changes in the Compressive Nonlinearity of the Cochlea During Early Aging: Estimates From Distortion OAE Input/Output Functions.

Authors:  Amanda J Ortmann; Carolina Abdala
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Evaluation of Remote Categorical Loudness Scaling.

Authors:  Judy G Kopun; McKenna Turner; Sara E Harris; Aryn M Kamerer; Stephen T Neely; Daniel M Rasetshwane
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 1.636

7.  Weakened Cochlear Nonlinearity During Human Aging and Perceptual Correlates.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Amanda J Ortmann; Yeini C Guardia
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 July/Aug       Impact factor: 3.562

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.