Literature DB >> 19206801

Comparing the optimal signal conditions for recording cubic and quadratic distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Lin Bian1, Shixiong Chen.   

Abstract

Odd- and even-order distortion products (DPs), evoked by two primary tones (f(1),f(2),f(1)<f(2)), represent different aspects of cochlear nonlinearity. The cubic and quadratic difference tones (CDT 2f(1)-f(2) and QDT f(2)-f(1)) are prominent representatives of the odd and even DPs. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) were measured within a primary level (L(1),L(2)) space over a wide range of f(2)f(1) ratios to compare the optimal signal conditions for these DPs. For CDT, the primary level difference decreased as L(1) increased with a rate proportional to the f(2)f(1) ratio. Moreover, the optimal ratio increased with L(1). A set of two formulas is proposed to describe the optimal signal conditions. However, for a given level of a primary, increasing the other tone level could maximize the QDT amplitude. The frequency ratio at the maximal QDT was about 1.3 and quite constant across different primary levels. A notch was found in the QDT amplitude at the f(2)f(1) ratio of about 1.22-1.25. These opposite behaviors suggest that the optimal recording conditions are different for CDT and QDT due to the different aspects in the cochlear nonlinearity. Optimizing the DPOAE recordings could improve the reliability in clinical or research practices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19206801      PMCID: PMC2676628          DOI: 10.1121/1.3001706

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  51 in total

1.  Distortion component analysis of outer hair cell motility-related gating charge.

Authors:  S Takahashi; J Santos-Sacchi
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  1999-06-01       Impact factor: 1.843

2.  The behavior of the acoustic distortion product, 2f1-f2, from the human ear and its relation to auditory sensitivity.

Authors:  S A Gaskill; A M Brown
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Cochlear compression: effects of low-frequency biasing on quadratic distortion product otoacoustic emission.

Authors:  Lin Bian
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Automatic monitoring of mechano-electrical transduction in the guinea pig cochlea.

Authors:  R Patuzzi; A Moleirinho
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  The level and growth behavior of the 2 f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission and its relationship to auditory sensitivity in normal hearing and cochlear hearing loss.

Authors:  P Kummer; T Janssen; W Arnold
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in human newborns and adults. I. Frequency effects.

Authors:  R E Lasky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The acoustic two-tone distortions 2f1-f2 and f2-f1 and their possible relation to changes in the operating point of the cochlear amplifier.

Authors:  G Frank; M Kössl
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1996-09-01       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Interpretation of distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements. I. Two stimulus tones.

Authors:  D M Mills
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Distortion product otoacoustic emission (2f1-f2) amplitude as a function of f2/f1 frequency ratio and primary tone level separation in human adults and neonates.

Authors:  C Abdala
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Dependence of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions on primary levels in normal and impaired ears. II. Asymmetry in L1,L2 space.

Authors:  M L Whitehead; B B Stagner; M J McCoy; B L Lonsbury-Martin; G K Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  2 in total

1.  Drug delivery into the cochlear apex: Improved control to sequentially affect finely spaced regions along the entire length of the cochlear spiral.

Authors:  J T Lichtenhan; J Hartsock; J R Dornhoffer; K M Donovan; A N Salt
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2016-08-06       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  Efferent modulation of pre-neural and neural distortion products.

Authors:  S B Smith; K Ichiba; D S Velenovsky; B Cone
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 3.208

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.