Literature DB >> 16299132

The relative effects of corneal thickness and age on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry.

A Kotecha1, E T White, J M Shewry, D F Garway-Heath.   

Abstract

AIMS: To establish the effects of central corneal thickness (CCT) on intraocular pressure (IOP) measured with a prototype Pascal dynamic contour tonometer (DCT), to evaluate the effect of CCT and age on the agreement between IOP measured with the Pascal DCT and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), and to compare the interobserver and intraobserver variation of the DCT with the GAT.
METHODS: GAT and DCT IOP measurements were made on 130 eyes of 130 patients and agreement was assessed by means of Bland-Altman plots. The effect of CCT and age on GAT/DCT IOP differences was assessed by linear regression analysis. Interobserver and intraobserver variations for GAT and DCT were assessed in 100 eyes of 100 patients.
RESULTS: The mean difference (95% limits of agreement) between GAT and DCT was -0.7 (-6.3 to 4.9) mm Hg. GAT/DCT IOP differences increased with thicker CCT (slope 0.017 mm Hg/microm, 95% CI 0.004 to 0.03, r2 = 0.05, p = 0.01), and with greater age, slope 0.05 mm Hg/year (95% CI 0.012 to 0.084, r2 = 0.05, p = 0.01). The intraobserver variability of GAT and DCT was 1.7 mm Hg and 3.2 mm Hg, respectively. The interobserver variability was (mean difference (95% limits of agreement)) 0.4 (-3.5 to 4.2) mm Hg for GAT and 0.2 (-4.9 to 5.3) mm Hg for DCT.
CONCLUSIONS: GAT is significantly more affected than DCT by both CCT and subject age. The effect of age suggests an age related corneal biomechanical change that may induce measurement error additional to that of CCT. The prototype DCT has greater measurement variability than the GAT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16299132      PMCID: PMC1772992          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2005.075580

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  18 in total

1.  Correlation between central corneal thickness, applanation tonometry, and direct intracameral IOP readings.

Authors:  N Feltgen; D Leifert; J Funk
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with the pneumotonometer, Goldmann applanation tonometer, and Tono-Pen.

Authors:  Archana Bhan; Andrew C Browning; Sunil Shah; Robin Hamilton; Dinesh Dave; Harminder S Dua
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Applanation tonometry and central corneal thickness.

Authors:  N Ehlers; T Bramsen; S Sperling
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1975-03

4.  Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with goldmann applanation tonometry.

Authors:  Claude Kaufmann; Lucas M Bachmann; Michael A Thiel
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Assessment of the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer in monitoring intraocular pressure in unoperated eyes and eyes after LASIK.

Authors:  Dimitrios S Siganos; Georgios I Papastergiou; Carlos Moedas
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.351

6.  Age-related changes of the corneal endothelium and stroma as seen in vivo by specular microscopy.

Authors:  E S Sherrard; P Novakovic; L Speedwell
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 8.  Effects of prostaglandins on the aqueous humor outflow pathways.

Authors:  Robert N Weinreb; Carol B Toris; B'Ann T Gabelt; James D Lindsey; Paul L Kaufman
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.048

9.  Intraocular pressure measurements using dynamic contour tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Claude Kaufmann; Lucas M Bachmann; Michael A Thiel
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Effect of corneal parameters on measurements using the pulsatile ocular blood flow tonograph and Goldmann applanation tonometer.

Authors:  P Gunvant; M Baskaran; L Vijaya; I S Joseph; R J Watkins; M Nallapothula; D C Broadway; D J O'Leary
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.638

View more
  38 in total

1.  Intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude variations during the Valsalva maneuver.

Authors:  Umit Aykan; Mesut Erdurmus; Burhan Yilmaz; Ahmet Hamdi Bilge
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 2.  [Dynamic contour tonometry].

Authors:  C Kniestedt; H E Kanngiesser
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Comparison of IOP measurement using GAT and DCT in patients with penetrating keratoplasties.

Authors:  A R Ismail; M Lamont; S Perera; D Khan-Lim; R Mehta; J D A Macleod; D F Anderson
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  [Influence of residual corneal bed thickness after myopic LASIK on intraocular pressure measurements. Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry].

Authors:  L Muller; T Kohnen
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  Clinical evaluation of multiparameter correction equations for Goldmann applanation tonometry.

Authors:  P G Davey; A Elsheikh; D F Garway-Heath
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Age differences in central and peripheral intraocular pressure using a rebound tonometer.

Authors:  J M González-Méijome; J Jorge; A Queirós; P Fernandes; R Montés-Micó; J B Almeida; M A Parafita
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-08-02       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Differences between Goldmann Applanation Tonometry and Dynamic Contour Tonometry following Trabeculectomy.

Authors:  Efstathios T Detorakis; Emilia Grammenandi; Ioannis G Pallikaris; Miltiadis K Tsilimbaris
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 1.909

8.  Comparison of Goldmann applanation and dynamic contour tonometry in a population of Mexican open-angle glaucoma patients.

Authors:  J Jimenez-Roman; F Gil-Carrasco; A Martinez; O Albis-Donado; J D De la Torre-Tovar
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 9.  Glaucoma management after corneal transplantation surgeries.

Authors:  Helen L Kornmann; Steven J Gedde
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.761

10.  Comparison between dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry.

Authors:  Jooeun Lee; Chang Hwan Lee; Jaewan Choi; Sam Young Yoon; Kyung Rim Sung; Seong Bae Park; Michael S Kook
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-03-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.