Literature DB >> 23492859

Clinical evaluation of multiparameter correction equations for Goldmann applanation tonometry.

P G Davey1, A Elsheikh, D F Garway-Heath.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the multiparameter equations in correcting intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained using the Goldmann applanation tonometer (IOPG) for the effects of central corneal thickness (CCT), corneal curvature (R), and age in different ethnic populations.
METHODS: Data of IOPG, CCT, R, and age were collected from three clinical centers. The sample size consisted of 945 eyes of 945 glaucoma patients or suspects (669 Europeans, 127 African Americans, and 149 Indians). The 'corrected IOP' was calculated using five multiparameter equations to decrease the association of CCT, R, and age with measured IOP. Regression analyses were performed to calculate variance (r(2)) and determine the association of CCT, R, and age with IOPG and corrected IOP (residual association).
RESULTS: Overall, CCT accounted for the majority of variance in IOPG, while R and age had a much smaller effect, with the combined effect on IOPG ranging from 4.7 to 7.5% in the three data sets. The residual association of CCT, R, and age with corrected IOP in the three groups ranged from 0.2 to 1.3% and 0.5 to 1.8% with the application of the Elsheikh and the Chihara equations, respectively. The residual association of CCT, R, and age with corrected IOP calculated using the Ehlers, Orssengo and Pye, and Shimmoyo equations were 7-11.5, 1.8-11.7, and 4.6-8.3%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The Elsheikh and the Chihara equations better decreased the association of CCT, R, and age with measured IOP than the Ehlers, Orssengo and Pye, and Shimmoyo equations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23492859      PMCID: PMC3650271          DOI: 10.1038/eye.2013.23

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  35 in total

1.  Correction factors for Goldmann Tonometry.

Authors:  Ahmed Elsheikh; Pinakin Gunvant; Stephen W Jones; David Pye; David Garway-Heath
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  Mae O Gordon; Julia A Beiser; James D Brandt; Dale K Heuer; Eve J Higginbotham; Chris A Johnson; John L Keltner; J Philip Miller; Richard K Parrish; M Roy Wilson; Michael A Kass
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-06

3.  Accuracy of clinical estimates of intraocular pressure in Chinese eyes.

Authors:  P J Foster; J S Wong; E Wong; F G Chen; D Machin; P T Chew
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Intraocular pressure, Goldmann applanation tension, corneal thickness, and corneal curvature in Caucasians, Asians, Hispanics, and African Americans.

Authors:  Mitsugu Shimmyo; Anna J Ross; Anna Moy; Ramin Mostafavi
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  The relationship between diurnal variations in intraocular pressure measurements and central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis.

Authors:  Aachal Kotecha; David P Crabb; Alexander Spratt; David F Garway-Heath
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Dynamic contour tonometry in comparison to intracameral IOP measurements.

Authors:  Andreas G Boehm; Anja Weber; Lutz E Pillunat; Rainer Koch; Eberhard Spoerl
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-03-03       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Factors for glaucoma progression and the effect of treatment: the early manifest glaucoma trial.

Authors:  M Cristina Leske; Anders Heijl; Mohamed Hussein; Bo Bengtsson; Leslie Hyman; Eugene Komaroff
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-01

8.  Intraocular pressure fluctuation a risk factor for visual field progression at low intraocular pressures in the advanced glaucoma intervention study.

Authors:  Joseph Caprioli; Anne L Coleman
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Effect of corneal parameters on measurements using the pulsatile ocular blood flow tonograph and Goldmann applanation tonometer.

Authors:  P Gunvant; M Baskaran; L Vijaya; I S Joseph; R J Watkins; M Nallapothula; D C Broadway; D J O'Leary
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Multiparameter correction equation for Goldmann applanation tonometry.

Authors:  Ahmed Elsheikh; Daad Alhasso; Pinakin Gunvant; David Garway-Heath
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.973

View more
  4 in total

1.  Dependence of dynamic contour and Goldmann applanation tonometries on peripheral corneal thickness.

Authors:  Federico Saenz-Frances; Claudia Sanz-Pozo; Lara Borrego-Sanz; Luis Jañez; Laura Morales-Fernandez; Jose Maria Martinez-de-la-Casa; Julian Garcia-Sanchez; Julian Garcia-Feijoo; Enrique Santos-Bueso
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Correlation Between Dynamic Contour Tonometry, Uncorrected and Corrected Goldmann Applanation Tonometry, and Stage of Glaucoma.

Authors:  Josephine Wachtl; Marc Töteberg-Harms; Sonja Frimmel; Malgorzata Roos; Christoph Kniestedt
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 7.389

3.  Repeatability, reproducibility and agreement of intraocular pressure measurement in rabbits by the TonoVet and Tono-Pen.

Authors:  Di Ma; Chong-Bo Chen; Jiajian Liang; Zhihao Lu; Haoyu Chen; Mingzhi Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Corneal biomechanical properties in different ocular conditions and new measurement techniques.

Authors:  Nery Garcia-Porta; Paulo Fernandes; Antonio Queiros; Jose Salgado-Borges; Manuel Parafita-Mato; Jose Manuel González-Méijome
Journal:  ISRN Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-03-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.