Literature DB >> 17576716

Comparison of IOP measurement using GAT and DCT in patients with penetrating keratoplasties.

A R Ismail, M Lamont, S Perera, D Khan-Lim, R Mehta, J D A Macleod, D F Anderson.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2007        PMID： 17576716      PMCID： PMC1955632          DOI： 10.1136/bjo.2006.099564

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN： 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


× No keyword cloud information.
  10 in total

1.  Correlation between central corneal thickness, applanation tonometry, and direct intracameral IOP readings.

Authors:  N Feltgen; D Leifert; J Funk
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Clinical comparison of ocular blood flow tonometer, Tonopen, and Goldmann applanation tonometer for measuring intraocular pressure in postkeratoplasty eyes.

Authors:  V J Rao; L Gnanaraj; K W Mitchell; F C Figueiredo
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.651

3.  Tono-Pen tonometry in normal and in post-keratoplasty eyes.

Authors:  O Geyer; Y Mayron; A Loewenstein; M Neudorfer; L Rothkoff; M Lazar
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with goldmann applanation tonometry.

Authors:  Claude Kaufmann; Lucas M Bachmann; Michael A Thiel
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  The relative effects of corneal thickness and age on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry.

Authors:  A Kotecha; E T White; J M Shewry; D F Garway-Heath
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Corneal curvature in applanation tonometry.

Authors:  H H Mark
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1973-08       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Reliability of proton and goldmann applanation tonometers in normal and postkeratoplasty eyes.

Authors:  Surinder S Pandav; Ashok Sharma; Amit Gupta; Suresh K Sharma; Amod Gupta; Bijayananda Patnaik
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  The effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurement in patients with corneal pathology.

Authors:  A C Browning; A Bhan; A P Rotchford; S Shah; H S Dua
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Intraocular pressure measurements using dynamic contour tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Claude Kaufmann; Lucas M Bachmann; Michael A Thiel
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Dynamic contour tonometry: a comparative study on human cadaver eyes.

Authors:  Christoph Kniestedt; Michelle Nee; Robert L Stamper
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-09
  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Comparison of iCare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry in normal corneas and in eyes with automated lamellar and penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  M L Salvetat; M Zeppieri; F Miani; C Tosoni; L Parisi; P Brusini
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Repeatability of intraocular pressure measurements with Icare PRO rebound, Tono-Pen AVIA, and Goldmann tonometers in sitting and reclining positions.

Authors:  Caterina Schweier; James V M Hanson; Jens Funk; Marc Töteberg-Harms
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 2.209

3.  Detecting IOP Fluctuations in Glaucoma Patients.

Authors:  Brenda Nuyen; Kaweh Mansouri
Journal:  Open Ophthalmol J       Date:  2016-02-29

Review 4.  Intraocular Pressure Measurement after Penetrating Keratoplasty.

Authors:  Otilia-Maria Dumitrescu; Sinziana Istrate; Mioara-Laura Macovei; Alina Gabriela Gheorghe
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-19
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.