Literature DB >> 11901134

An estimator for pairwise relatedness using molecular markers.

Jinliang Wang1.   

Abstract

I propose a new estimator for jointly estimating two-gene and four-gene coefficients of relatedness between individuals from an outbreeding population with data on codominant genetic markers and compare it, by Monte Carlo simulations, to previous ones in precision and accuracy for different distributions of population allele frequencies, numbers of alleles per locus, actual relationships, sample sizes, and proportions of relatives included in samples. In contrast to several previous estimators, the new estimator is well behaved and applies to any number of alleles per locus and any allele frequency distribution. The estimates for two- and four-gene coefficients of relatedness from the new estimator are unbiased irrespective of the sample size and have sampling variances decreasing consistently with an increasing number of alleles per locus to the minimum asymptotic values determined by the variation in identity-by-descent among loci per se, regardless of the actual relationship. The new estimator is also robust for small sample sizes and for unknown relatives being included in samples for estimating allele frequencies. Compared to previous estimators, the new one is generally advantageous, especially for highly polymorphic loci and/or small sample sizes.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11901134      PMCID: PMC1462003     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  9 in total

1.  Estimation of pairwise relatedness with molecular markers.

Authors:  M Lynch; K Ritland
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Estimating quantitative genetic parameters using sibships reconstructed from marker data.

Authors:  S C Thomas; W G Hill
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  A comparison of microsatellite-based pairwise relatedness estimators.

Authors:  T Van de Casteele; P Galbusera; E Matthysen
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 6.185

Review 4.  Marker-inferred relatedness as a tool for detecting heritability in nature.

Authors:  K Ritland
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 6.185

5.  A restriction on the space of genetic relationships.

Authors:  E A Thompson
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 1.670

6.  The estimation of pairwise relationships.

Authors:  E A Thompson
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 1.670

7.  Estimation of relatedness by DNA fingerprinting.

Authors:  M Lynch
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  Similarity of DNA fingerprints due to chance and relatedness.

Authors:  C C Li; D E Weeks; A Chakravarti
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  1993 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 0.444

9.  Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations.

Authors:  T C Marshall; J Slate; L E Kruuk; J M Pemberton
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 6.185

  9 in total
  131 in total

1.  Maximum-likelihood estimation of relatedness.

Authors:  Brook G Milligan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Unbiased relatedness estimation in structured populations.

Authors:  Jinliang Wang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Estimating Relatedness in the Presence of Null Alleles.

Authors:  Kang Huang; Kermit Ritland; Derek W Dunn; Xiaoguang Qi; Songtao Guo; Baoguo Li
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  The estimation of genetic relationships using molecular markers and their efficiency in estimating heritability in natural populations.

Authors:  Stuart C Thomas
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Adaptive genetic complementarity in mate choice coexists with selection for elaborate sexual traits.

Authors:  Kevin P Oh; Alexander V Badyaev
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Performance of marker-based relatedness estimators in natural populations of outbred vertebrates.

Authors:  Katalin Csilléry; Toby Johnson; Dario Beraldi; Tim Clutton-Brock; Dave Coltman; Bengt Hansson; Goran Spong; Josephine M Pemberton
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-06-18       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  A mixed-model approach to association mapping using pedigree information with an illustration of resistance to Phytophthora infestans in potato.

Authors:  M Malosetti; C G van der Linden; B Vosman; F A van Eeuwijk
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  A maximum-likelihood method for the estimation of pairwise relatedness in structured populations.

Authors:  Amy D Anderson; Bruce S Weir
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-03-04       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Using genetic markers in unpedigreed populations to detect a heritable trait.

Authors:  Ken G Dodds; Peter R Amer; Benoît Auvray
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.066

10.  Major histocompatibility complex-linked social signalling affects female fertility.

Authors:  D Burger; S Thomas; H Aepli; M Dreyer; G Fabre; E Marti; H Sieme; M R Robinson; C Wedekind
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.