Literature DB >> 20610906

Genomic similarity and kernel methods I: advancements by building on mathematical and statistical foundations.

Daniel J Schaid1.   

Abstract

Measures of genomic similarity are the basis of many statistical analytic methods. We review the mathematical and statistical basis of similarity methods, particularly based on kernel methods. A kernel function converts information for a pair of subjects to a quantitative value representing either similarity (larger values meaning more similar) or distance (smaller values meaning more similar), with the requirement that it must create a positive semidefinite matrix when applied to all pairs of subjects. This review emphasizes the wide range of statistical methods and software that can be used when similarity is based on kernel methods, such as nonparametric regression, linear mixed models and generalized linear mixed models, hierarchical models, score statistics, and support vector machines. The mathematical rigor for these methods is summarized, as is the mathematical framework for making kernels. This review provides a framework to move from intuitive and heuristic approaches to define genomic similarities to more rigorous methods that can take advantage of powerful statistical modeling and existing software. A companion paper reviews novel approaches to creating kernels that might be useful for genomic analyses, providing insights with examples [1].
Copyright © 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20610906      PMCID: PMC7077093          DOI: 10.1159/000312641

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Hered        ISSN: 0001-5652            Impact factor:   0.444


  54 in total

1.  Linkage disequilibrium mapping via cladistic analysis of single-nucleotide polymorphism haplotypes.

Authors:  Caroline Durrant; Krina T Zondervan; Lon R Cardon; Sarah Hunt; Panos Deloukas; Andrew P Morris
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  The haplotype runs test: the parent-parent-affected offspring trio design.

Authors:  Ethan M Lange; Michael Boehnke
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.135

3.  Nonparametric tests of association of multiple genes with human disease.

Authors:  Daniel J Schaid; Shannon K McDonnell; Scott J Hebbring; Julie M Cunningham; Stephen N Thibodeau
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2005-03-22       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Detecting disease gene in DNA haplotype sequences by nonparametric dissimilarity test.

Authors:  Ao Yuan; Qingqi Yue; Victor Apprey; George Bonney
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2006-06-29       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Genomic-assisted prediction of genetic value with semiparametric procedures.

Authors:  Daniel Gianola; Rohan L Fernando; Alessandra Stella
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Multivariate regression analysis of distance matrices for testing associations between gene expression patterns and related variables.

Authors:  Matthew A Zapala; Nicholas J Schork
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-12-04       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Generalized genomic distance-based regression methodology for multilocus association analysis.

Authors:  Jennifer Wessel; Nicholas J Schork
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2006-09-21       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Association mapping via regularized regression analysis of single-nucleotide-polymorphism haplotypes in variable-sized sliding windows.

Authors:  Yi Li; Wing-Kin Sung; Jian Jun Liu
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2007-02-19       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  A powerful and flexible multilocus association test for quantitative traits.

Authors:  Lydia Coulter Kwee; Dawei Liu; Xihong Lin; Debashis Ghosh; Michael P Epstein
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Haplotype-based association analysis via variance-components score test.

Authors:  Jung-Ying Tzeng; Daowen Zhang
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2007-10-03       Impact factor: 11.025

View more
  52 in total

Review 1.  Genomic similarity and kernel methods II: methods for genomic information.

Authors:  Daniel J Schaid
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2010-07-03       Impact factor: 0.444

Review 2.  Model selection and psychological theory: a discussion of the differences between the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC).

Authors:  Scott I Vrieze
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2012-02-06

Review 3.  Predicting genetic predisposition in humans: the promise of whole-genome markers.

Authors:  Gustavo de los Campos; Daniel Gianola; David B Allison
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  Multiple genetic variant association testing by collapsing and kernel methods with pedigree or population structured data.

Authors:  Daniel J Schaid; Shannon K McDonnell; Jason P Sinnwell; Stephen N Thibodeau
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2013-05-05       Impact factor: 2.135

5.  Studying gene and gene-environment effects of uncommon and common variants on continuous traits: a marker-set approach using gene-trait similarity regression.

Authors:  Jung-Ying Tzeng; Daowen Zhang; Monnat Pongpanich; Chris Smith; Mark I McCarthy; Michèle M Sale; Bradford B Worrall; Fang-Chi Hsu; Duncan C Thomas; Patrick F Sullivan
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Testing for polygenic effects in genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Wei Pan; Yue-Ming Chen; Peng Wei
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 2.135

7.  Massively expedited genome-wide heritability analysis (MEGHA).

Authors:  Tian Ge; Thomas E Nichols; Phil H Lee; Avram J Holmes; Joshua L Roffman; Randy L Buckner; Mert R Sabuncu; Jordan W Smoller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Imaging-wide association study: Integrating imaging endophenotypes in GWAS.

Authors:  Zhiyuan Xu; Chong Wu; Wei Pan
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Powerful Genetic Association Analysis for Common or Rare Variants with High-Dimensional Structured Traits.

Authors:  Xiang Zhan; Ni Zhao; Anna Plantinga; Timothy A Thornton; Karen N Conneely; Michael P Epstein; Michael C Wu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Rare nonsynonymous exonic variants in addiction and behavioral disinhibition.

Authors:  Scott I Vrieze; Shuang Feng; Michael B Miller; Brian M Hicks; Nathan Pankratz; Gonçalo R Abecasis; William G Iacono; Matt McGue
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 13.382

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.