Literature DB >> 29390734

Swept-tone stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions: Normative data and methodological considerations.

Carolina Abdala1, Yeini C Guardia1, Christopher A Shera1.   

Abstract

Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs) are reflection-source emissions, and are the least familiar and perhaps most underutilized otoacoustic emission. Here, normative SFOAE data are presented from a large group of 48 young adults at probe levels from 20 to 60 dB sound pressure level (SPL) across a four-octave frequency range to characterize the typical SFOAE and describe recent methodological advances that have made its measurement more efficient. In young-adult ears, SFOAE levels peaked in the low-to-mid frequencies at mean levels of ∼6-7 dB SPL while signal-to-noise ranged from 23 to 34 dB SPL and test-retest reliability was ±4 dB for 90% of the SFOAE data. On average, females had ∼2.5 dB higher SFOAE levels than males. SFOAE input/output functions showed near linear growth at low levels and a compression threshold averaging 35 dB SPL across frequency. SFOAE phase accumulated ∼32-36 cycles across four octaves on average, and showed level effects when converted to group delay: low-level probes produced longer SFOAE delays. A "break" in the normalized SFOAE delay was observed at 1.1 kHz on average, elucidating the location of the putative apical-basal transition. Technical innovations such as the concurrent sweeping of multiple frequency segments, post hoc suppressor decontamination, and a post hoc artifact-rejection technique were tested.

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29390734      PMCID: PMC5770274          DOI: 10.1121/1.5020275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  40 in total

1.  Optimizing swept-tone protocols for recording distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in adults and newborns.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Ping Luo; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Comparing stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions measured by compression, suppression, and spectral smoothing.

Authors:  Radha Kalluri; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Obtaining reliable phase-gradient delays from otoacoustic emission data.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; Christopher Bergevin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs.

Authors:  C A Shera; J J Guinan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Distortion-product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in humans.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely; Judy Kopun; Hongyang Tan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Level dependence of distortion product otoacoustic emission phase is attributed to component mixing.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Sumitrajit Dhar; Radha Kalluri
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Aging of the medial olivocochlear reflex and associations with speech perception.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Sumitrajit Dhar; Mahnaz Ahmadi; Ping Luo
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Behavioral hearing thresholds between 0.125 and 20 kHz using depth-compensated ear simulator calibration.

Authors:  Jungmee Lee; Sumitrajit Dhar; Rebekah Abel; Renee Banakis; Evan Grolley; Jungwha Lee; Steven Zecker; Jonathan Siegel
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Towards a joint reflection-distortion otoacoustic emission profile: Results in normal and impaired ears.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Radha Kalluri
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Profiles of Stimulus-Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions from 0.5 to 20 kHz in Humans.

Authors:  James B Dewey; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-09-28
View more
  8 in total

1.  Effects of Forward- and Emitted-Pressure Calibrations on the Variability of Otoacoustic Emission Measurements Across Repeated Probe Fits.

Authors:  Tom Maxim; Christopher A Shera; Karolina K Charaziak; Carolina Abdala
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Characterizing the Relationship Between Reflection and Distortion Otoacoustic Emissions in Normal-Hearing Adults.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Ping Luo; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-07-08

3.  A cochlea with three parts? Evidence from otoacoustic emission phase in humans.

Authors:  Anders T Christensen; Carolina Abdala; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Reflection- and Distortion-Source Otoacoustic Emissions: Evidence for Increased Irregularity in the Human Cochlea During Aging.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Amanda J Ortmann; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-07-02

5.  Reflection-Source Emissions Evoked with Clicks and Frequency Sweeps: Comparisons Across Levels.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-10-04

6.  Variable-rate frequency sweeps and their application to the measurement of otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Anders T Christensen; Carolina Abdala; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.482

7.  Sexual Dimorphism in the Functional Development of the Cochlear Amplifier in Humans.

Authors:  Srikanta K Mishra; Samantha Zambrano; Hansapani Rodrigo
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 July/Aug       Impact factor: 3.562

8.  Swept-Tone Stimulus-Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions in Human Newborns.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Ping Luo; Yeini Guardia
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.496

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.