Literature DB >> 20632581

Cone beam CT dosimetry: a unified and self-consistent approach including all scan modalities--with or without phantom motion.

Robert L Dixon1, John M Boone.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This article describes a common methodology and measurement technique, encompassing both conventional (helical and axial) CT scanning using phantom translation and cone beam (or narrow fan beam) CT scans about a stationary phantom. Cone beam CT systems having beam widths along the z-axis wide enough to cover a significant anatomical length (50-160 mm) in a single axial rotation (e.g., in cardiac CT) are rapidly proliferating in the clinic, referred to herein as stationary cone beam CT (SCBCT). The integral format of the CTDI paradigm is not appropriate for a stationary phantom, and is not useful for predicting the dose in SCBCT, nor for perfusion studies or CT fluoroscopy. Likewise, the pencil chamber has limited utility in this domain (even one of extended length).
METHODS: By demonstrating, both experimentally and theoretically, the match between the dose distribution f(z) for a wide cone beam and that due to an axial scan series D(z), it is shown that the dose on the central ray of the cone beam f(0) is both spatially colocated and numerically equal to the dose predicted by CTDI for the axial series; and thus f(0) is the logical (and unique) choice for a SCBCT dose-descriptor consistent with the CTDI-based dose of conventional CT. This dose f(0) can be readily measured using a conventional (short) ionization chamber. Additionally, Monte Carlo simulations of Boone [J. M. Boone, "Dose spread functions in computed tomography: A Monte Carlo study," Med. Phys. 36, 4547-4554 (2009)], expressed as a scatter LSF (or DSF), allow the application of a convolution-based model [R. L. Dixon, M. T. Munley, and E. Bayram, "An improved analytical model for CT dose simulation with a new look at the theory of CT dose," Med. Phys. 32, 3712-3728 (2005)] of the axial dose profile f(z) for any primary beam width a (any n x T), fan beam and cone beam alike, from a single LSF kernel; its simple form allows the results to be expressed as simple analytical equations. The experimental data of Mori et al. [S. Mori, M. Endo, K. Nishizawa, T. Tsunoo, T. Aoyama, H. Fujiwara, and K. Murase, "Enlarged longitudinal dose profiles in cone-beam CT and the need for modified dosimetry," Med. Phys. 32, 1061-1069 (2005)] from a 256 channel cone beam scanner for a variety of beam widths (28-138 mm) are used to corroborate the theory.
RESULTS: Useful commonalities between SCBCT and conventional CT dose are revealed, including a common equilibrium dose parameter A(eq), which is independent of z-collimator aperture a (or n x T), and a common analytical (exponential growth) function H(lambda) describing the relative approach to scatter equilibrium at z = 0 for both modalities (with lambda = a or lambda = scan length L). This function exhibits good agreement with the above-mentioned cone beam data of Mori et al. for H(a) as well as with data H(L) obtained from conventional CT scanning [R. L. Dixon and A. C. Ballard, "Experimental validation of a versatile system of CT dosimetry using a conventional ion chamber: Beyond CTDI100," Med. Phys. 34(8), 3399-3413 (2007)] for the same directly irradiated, phantom length L = a.
CONCLUSIONS: This methodology and associated mathematical theory provide a physically self-consistent description of dose between stationary phantom CT and conventional CT, and has predictive capabilities which can be used to effect a substantial reduction in data collection; provide a bridge between modalities; and predict the relevant peak doses f(0) for perfusion studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20632581      PMCID: PMC2885943          DOI: 10.1118/1.3395578

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  11 in total

1.  Monte Carlo assessment of computed tomography dose to tissue adjacent to the scanned volume.

Authors:  J M Boone; V N Cooper; W R Nemzek; J P McGahan; J A Seibert
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  A new look at CT dose measurement: beyond CTDI.

Authors:  Robert L Dixon
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Restructuring CT dosimetry--a realistic strategy for the future Requiem for the pencil chamber.

Authors:  Robert L Dixon
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Experimental validation of a versatile system of CT dosimetry using a conventional ion chamber: beyond CTDI100.

Authors:  Robert L Dixon; Adam C Ballard
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 5.  CT dosimetry: comparison of measurement techniques and devices.

Authors:  John A Bauhs; Thomas J Vrieze; Andrew N Primak; Michael R Bruesewitz; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.333

6.  Novel methods of measuring single scan dose profiles and cumulative dose in CT.

Authors:  K D Nakonechny; B G Fallone; S Rathee
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  A method for describing the doses delivered by transmission x-ray computed tomography.

Authors:  T B Shope; R M Gagne; G C Johnson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1981 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Enlarged longitudinal dose profiles in cone-beam CT and the need for modified dosimetry.

Authors:  Shinichiro Mori; Masahiro Endo; Kanae Nishizawa; Takanori Tsunoo; Takahiko Aoyama; Hideaki Fujiwara; Kenya Murase
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Dose spread functions in computed tomography: a Monte Carlo study.

Authors:  John M Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  The trouble with CTD100.

Authors:  John M Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  8 in total

1.  Dose distribution for dental cone beam CT and its implication for defining a dose index.

Authors:  R Pauwels; C Theodorakou; A Walker; H Bosmans; R Jacobs; K Horner; R Bogaerts
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Practical dose point-based methods to characterize dose distribution in a stationary elliptical body phantom for a cone-beam C-arm CT system.

Authors:  Jang-Hwan Choi; Dragos Constantin; Arundhuti Ganguly; Erin Girard; Richard L Morin; Robert L Dixon; Rebecca Fahrig
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Ultralow dose dentomaxillofacial CT imaging and iterative reconstruction techniques: variability of Hounsfield units and contrast-to-noise ratio.

Authors:  Gerlig Widmann; Alexander Bischel; Andreas Stratis; Apoorv Kakar; Hilde Bosmans; Reinhilde Jacobs; Eva-Maria Gassner; Wolfgang Puelacher; Ruben Pauwels
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Dosimetric assessment of the exposure of radiotherapy patients due to cone-beam CT procedures.

Authors:  Mariana Baptista; Salvatore Di Maria; Sandra Vieira; Joana Santos; Joana Pereira; Miguel Pereira; Pedro Vaz
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 1.925

5.  CT dose index and patient dose: they are not the same thing.

Authors:  Cynthia H McCollough; Shuai Leng; Lifeng Yu; Dianna D Cody; John M Boone; Michael F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Computed tomography dose index and dose length product for cone-beam CT: Monte Carlo simulations.

Authors:  Sangroh Kim; Haijun Song; Ehsan Samei; Fang-Fang Yin; Terry T Yoshizumi
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Evaluation of cumulative dose for cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans within phantoms made from different compositions using Monte Carlo simulations.

Authors:  Abdullah Abuhaimed; Colin J Martin; Marimuthu Sankaralingam; Kurian Oomen; David J Gentle
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Radiation Dose Measurements in a 256-Slice Computed Tomography Scanner.

Authors:  Victor J Weir; Jie Zhang
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.