Literature DB >> 2212308

The behavior of the acoustic distortion product, 2f1-f2, from the human ear and its relation to auditory sensitivity.

S A Gaskill1, A M Brown.   

Abstract

The acoustic intermodulation distortion product 2f1-f2 (ADP) was measured in human subjects to investigate (1) the dependence of ADP level on stimulus parameters and (2) the relationship between ADP level and auditory sensitivity. The frequency ratio (f2/f1), at which ADP level is maximal, varies only slightly across frequency and subjects. The average optimal ratio is 1.225. Beyond the maximum, the ADP level declines with increasing f2/f1 ratio, at rates of up to 250 dB/oct. As the level of one stimulus is increased relative to the other, the ADP grows, saturates, and in most cases shows a bendover. Maximum distortion is generated when L 1 exceeds L 2. Growth rate and saturation point are dependent on which stimulus is incremented and on the level of the stationary stimulus. With optimal stimulus parameters (levels below 60 dB SPL; L 1 greater than L 2 by 15 dB; f2/f1 = 1.225), ADP levels are commonly 30 dB below L 2. Patterns of ADP level across frequency vary between subjects, but are repeatable within each subject. As the frequency of one or both of the stimuli is varied, changes in ADP level exhibit a broadly featured pattern with a fine structure superimposed upon it. This fine structure was compared with the features in the stimulus frequency emission spectrum in one subject. With appropriate stimulus parameters, half of our subjects show a statistically significant correlation across frequency, between ADP level and auditory sensitivity at the corresponding f1 frequency. Our results suggest that, with low levels of stimulation, ADP measurements could form the basis of an objective measure of cochlear function in human subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2212308     DOI: 10.1121/1.399732

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  45 in total

1.  High-frequency two-tone distortions from the ear of the mustached bat, Pteronotus parnellii reflect enhanced cochlear tuning.

Authors:  M Kössl
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  1992-09

Review 2.  [Sound and velocity DPOAEs : Technology, methodology and perspectives].

Authors:  E Dalhoff; A Vetesník; D Turcanu; A W Gummer
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Distortion-product otoacoustic emission measured with continuously varying stimulus level.

Authors:  Stephen T Neely; Tiffany A Johnson; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Influence of primary-level and primary-frequency ratios on human distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Tiffany A Johnson; Stephen T Neely; Cassie A Garner; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Comparing the optimal signal conditions for recording cubic and quadratic distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Lin Bian; Shixiong Chen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Comparison of compound action potential audiograms with distortion product otoacoustic emissions in experimentally induced hydrops.

Authors:  K C Horner
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Influence of stimulus parameters on amplitude-modulated stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Tiffany A Johnson; Laura Beshaler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Comparing behavioral and physiological measures of combination tones: sex and race differences.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Edward G Pasanen; Erin M Leshikar; Michelle D Hsieh; Mindy M Maloney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Low-frequency and high-frequency distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression in humans.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely; Darcia M Dierking; Judy Kopun; Kristin Jolkowski; Kristin Groenenboom; Hongyang Tan; Bettina Stiegemann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Sex differences in distortion-product and transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions compared.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Glen K Martin; Barden B Stagner; Mindy M Maloney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.