Literature DB >> 2921404

Acoustic distortion products in humans: systematic changes in amplitudes as a function of f2/f1 ratio.

F P Harris1, B L Lonsbury-Martin, B B Stagner, A C Coats, G K Martin.   

Abstract

The effects of primary-tone separation on the amplitude of distortion-product emissions (DPEs) at the 2f1-f2 frequency were systematically examined in ten ears of five subjects. All individuals had normal hearing and middle-ear function based upon standard clinical measures. Acoustic-distortion products were elicited at 1, 2.5, and 4 kHz by equilevel primaries at 65, 75, and 85 dB SPL, while f2/f1 ratios were varied in 0.02 increments from 1.01-1.41 (4 kHz), 1.01-1.59 (2.5 kHz), or 1.01-1.79 (1 kHz). A principal outcome reflected in the detailed structure of both average and individual ratio functions was a nonmonotonic change in DPE amplitude as the ratio of f2/f1 increased. Despite the presence of amplitude nonmonotonicities, there was clearly a region of f1 and f2 separation that generated a maximum DPE. The effects of primary-tone separation on DPE amplitudes were systematically related to DPE frequency and primary-tone level. For all three levels of stimulation, the f2/f1 ratio was inversely related to DPE frequency. Thus larger ratios reflecting a greater separation of f1 and f2 were more effective in generating DPEs at 1 kHz rather than at 4 kHz. The optimal ratio for 2.5 kHz fell at an intermediate value. Conversely, acoustic distortion-product amplitude as a function of primary-tone level was directly related to the frequency separation of the primary tones. Regardless of the frequency region of the primary tones, smaller f2/f1 ratios were superior in generating DPEs in response to 65-dB stimuli, whereas larger ratios elicited bigger DPEs with primaries at 75 and 85 dB SPL. Within any specific stimulus-parameter combination, individual variability in DPE amplitude was noted. When all stimulus conditions describing the variations in frequency and level were considered, an f2/f1 ratio of 1.22 was most effective in maximizing DPE amplitude.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2921404     DOI: 10.1121/1.397728

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  25 in total

1.  Distortion-product otoacoustic emission measured with continuously varying stimulus level.

Authors:  Stephen T Neely; Tiffany A Johnson; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  A validation and potential clinical application of multivariate analyses of distortion-product otoacoustic emission data.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Darcia M Dierking; Tiffany A Johnson; Kathryn L Beauchaine; Cassie A Garner; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Influence of primary-level and primary-frequency ratios on human distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Tiffany A Johnson; Stephen T Neely; Cassie A Garner; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Comparing the optimal signal conditions for recording cubic and quadratic distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Lin Bian; Shixiong Chen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Comparison of compound action potential audiograms with distortion product otoacoustic emissions in experimentally induced hydrops.

Authors:  K C Horner
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Influence of stimulus parameters on amplitude-modulated stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Tiffany A Johnson; Laura Beshaler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  A tectorial membrane fovea in the cochlea of the mustached bat.

Authors:  M Kössl; M Vater
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  1996-02

8.  Limitations in the use of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in objective audiometry as the result of fine structure.

Authors:  J Heitmann; B Waldmann; P K Plinkert
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Two-tone suppression of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; John C Ellison; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Click- and tone-burst-evoked otoacoustic emissions in normally hearing ears and in ears with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  R Hauser; R Probst; E Löhle
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.