Literature DB >> 15566171

LOR-OSEM: statistical PET reconstruction from raw line-of-response histograms.

Dan J Kadrmas1.   

Abstract

Iterative statistical reconstruction methods are becoming the standard in positron emission tomography (PET). Conventional maximum-likelihood expectation-maximization (MLEM) and ordered-subsets (OSEM) algorithms act on data which have been pre-processed into corrected, evenly-spaced histograms; however, such pre-processing corrupts the Poisson statistics. Recent advances have incorporated attenuation, scatter and randoms compensation into the iterative reconstruction. The objective of this work was to incorporate the remaining pre-processing steps, including arc correction, to reconstruct directly from raw unevenly-spaced line-of-response (LOR) histograms. This exactly preserves Poisson statistics and full spatial information in a manner closely related to listmode ML, making full use of the ML statistical model. The LOR-OSEM algorithm was implemented using a rotation-based projector which maps directly to the unevenly-spaced LOR grid. Simulation and phantom experiments were performed to characterize resolution, contrast and noise properties for 2D PET. LOR-OSEM provided a beneficial noise-resolution tradeoff, outperforming AW-OSEM by about the same margin that AW-OSEM outperformed pre-corrected OSEM. The relationship between LOR-ML and listmode ML algorithms was explored, and implementation differences are discussed. LOR-OSEM is a viable alternative to AW-OSEM for histogram-based reconstruction with improved spatial resolution and noise properties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15566171      PMCID: PMC2903972          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/49/20/005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  14 in total

1.  The design and implementation of COSEM, an iterative algorithm for fully 3-D listmode data.

Authors:  R Levkovitz; D Falikman; M Zibulevsky; A Ben-Tal; A Nemirovski
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Comparative evaluation of lesion detectability for 6 PET imaging platforms using a highly reproducible whole-body phantom with (22)Na lesions and localization ROC analysis.

Authors:  Dan J Kadrmas; Paul E Christian
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  List-mode maximum-likelihood reconstruction applied to positron emission mammography (PEM) with irregular sampling.

Authors:  R H Huesman; G J Klein; W W Moses; J Qi; B W Reutter; P R Virador
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  A convolution-subtraction scatter correction method for 3D PET.

Authors:  D L Bailey; S R Meikle
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data.

Authors:  H M Hudson; R S Larkin
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  A row-action alternative to the EM algorithm for maximizing likelihood in emission tomography.

Authors:  J Browne; A B de Pierro
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Maximum likelihood reconstruction for emission tomography.

Authors:  L A Shepp; Y Vardi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  List-mode likelihood.

Authors:  H H Barrett; T White; L C Parra
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.129

9.  Bayesian reconstruction of PET images: methodology and performance analysis.

Authors:  E U Mumcuoğlu; R M Leahy; S R Cherry
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  EM reconstruction algorithms for emission and transmission tomography.

Authors:  K Lange; R Carson
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 1.826

View more
  20 in total

1.  Evaluation of the spatial dependence of the point spread function in 2D PET image reconstruction using LOR-OSEM.

Authors:  D Wiant; J A Gersh; M Bennett; J D Bourland
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Evaluation of Noise Properties in PSF-Based PET Image Reconstruction.

Authors:  Shan Tong; Adam M Alessio; Paul E Kinahan
Journal:  IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec (1997)       Date:  2009-10-24

3.  Iterative reconstruction using a Monte Carlo based system transfer matrix for dedicated breast positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Krishnendu Saha; Kenneth J Straus; Yu Chen; Stephen J Glick
Journal:  J Appl Phys       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 2.546

4.  Properties of noise in positron emission tomography images reconstructed with filtered-backprojection and row-action maximum likelihood algorithm.

Authors:  A Teymurazyan; T Riauka; H-S Jans; D Robinson
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Physiological ¹⁸F-FDG uptake by the spinal cord: is it a point of consideration for cancer patients?

Authors:  Amr Amin; Sandra J Rosenbaum; Andreas Bockisch
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  Effect of Scan Time on Oncologic Lesion Detection in Whole-Body PET.

Authors:  Dan J Kadrmas; M Bugrahan Oktay; Michael E Casey; James J Hamill
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.679

7.  Rotate-and-slant projector for fast LOR-based fully-3-D iterative PET reconstruction.

Authors:  Dan J Kadrmas
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  Investigation of optimization-based reconstruction with an image-total-variation constraint in PET.

Authors:  Zheng Zhang; Jinghan Ye; Buxin Chen; Amy E Perkins; Sean Rose; Emil Y Sidky; Chien-Min Kao; Dan Xia; Chi-Hua Tung; Xiaochuan Pan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Experimental comparison of lesion detectability for four fully-3D PET reconstruction schemes.

Authors:  Dan J Kadrmas; Michael E Casey; Noel F Black; James J Hamill; Vladimir Y Panin; Maurizio Conti
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  Impact of time-of-flight on PET tumor detection.

Authors:  Dan J Kadrmas; Michael E Casey; Maurizio Conti; Bjoern W Jakoby; Cristina Lois; David W Townsend
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 10.057

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.