Literature DB >> 22850933

Properties of noise in positron emission tomography images reconstructed with filtered-backprojection and row-action maximum likelihood algorithm.

A Teymurazyan1, T Riauka, H-S Jans, D Robinson.   

Abstract

Noise levels observed in positron emission tomography (PET) images complicate their geometric interpretation. Post-processing techniques aimed at noise reduction may be employed to overcome this problem. The detailed characteristics of the noise affecting PET images are, however, often not well known. Typically, it is assumed that overall the noise may be characterized as Gaussian. Other PET-imaging-related studies have been specifically aimed at the reduction of noise represented by a Poisson or mixed Poisson + Gaussian model. The effectiveness of any approach to noise reduction greatly depends on a proper quantification of the characteristics of the noise present. This work examines the statistical properties of noise in PET images acquired with a GEMINI PET/CT scanner. Noise measurements have been performed with a cylindrical phantom injected with (11)C and well mixed to provide a uniform activity distribution. Images were acquired using standard clinical protocols and reconstructed with filtered-backprojection (FBP) and row-action maximum likelihood algorithm (RAMLA). Statistical properties of the acquired data were evaluated and compared to five noise models (Poisson, normal, negative binomial, log-normal, and gamma). Histograms of the experimental data were used to calculate cumulative distribution functions and produce maximum likelihood estimates for the parameters of the model distributions. Results obtained confirm the poor representation of both RAMLA- and FBP-reconstructed PET data by the Poisson distribution. We demonstrate that the noise in RAMLA-reconstructed PET images is very well characterized by gamma distribution followed closely by normal distribution, while FBP produces comparable conformity with both normal and gamma statistics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 22850933      PMCID: PMC3649042          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-012-9511-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  22 in total

1.  Noise characterization of block-iterative reconstruction algorithms: I. Theory.

Authors:  E J Soares; C L Byrne; S J Glick
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Counting statistics.

Authors:  M S Rzeszotarski
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1999 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.333

3.  A pseudo-Poisson noise model for simulation of positron emission tomographic projection data.

Authors:  R W Rowe; S Dai
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1992 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Noise properties of the EM algorithm: I. Theory.

Authors:  H H Barrett; D W Wilson; B M Tsui
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  EM reconstruction algorithms for emission and transmission tomography.

Authors:  K Lange; R Carson
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 1.826

6.  Quantitative potentials of dynamic emission computed tomography.

Authors:  T F Budinger; S E Derenzo; W L Greenberg; G T Gullberg; R H Huesman
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Analysis of recorded image noise in nuclear medicine.

Authors:  B M Tsui; R N Beck; K Doi; C E Metz
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Preoperative staging of non-small-cell lung cancer with positron-emission tomography.

Authors:  R M Pieterman; J W van Putten; J J Meuzelaar; E L Mooyaart; W Vaalburg; G H Koëter; V Fidler; J Pruim; H J Groen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-07-27       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Consequences of using a simplified kinetic model for dynamic PET data.

Authors:  P G Coxson; R H Huesman; L Borland
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Improving treatment planning accuracy through multimodality imaging.

Authors:  S L Sailer; J G Rosenman; M Soltys; T J Cullip; J Chen
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1996-04-01       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  8 in total

1.  Joint solution for PET image segmentation, denoising, and partial volume correction.

Authors:  Ziyue Xu; Mingchen Gao; Georgios Z Papadakis; Brian Luna; Sanjay Jain; Daniel J Mollura; Ulas Bagci
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 8.545

2.  Self-supervised PET Denoising.

Authors:  Si Young Yie; Seung Kwan Kang; Donghwi Hwang; Jae Sung Lee
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-10-20

3.  Correlated functional connectivity and glucose metabolism in brain white matter revealed by simultaneous MRI/positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Bin Guo; Fugen Zhou; Muwei Li; John C Gore; Zhaohua Ding
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 3.737

4.  Phantom validation of quantitative Y-90 PET/CT-based dosimetry in liver radioembolization.

Authors:  Marco D'Arienzo; Maria Pimpinella; Marco Capogni; Vanessa De Coste; Luca Filippi; Emiliano Spezi; Nick Patterson; Francesca Mariotti; Paolo Ferrari; Paola Chiaramida; Michael Tapner; Alexander Fischer; Timo Paulus; Roberto Pani; Giuseppe Iaccarino; Marco D'Andrea; Lidia Strigari; Oreste Bagni
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 3.138

5.  EARL compliance measurements on the biograph vision Quadra PET/CT system with a long axial field of view.

Authors:  George A Prenosil; Michael Hentschel; Thilo Weitzel; Hasan Sari; Kuangyu Shi; Ali Afshar-Oromieh; Axel Rominger
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2022-04-08

6.  Guide to Plant-PET Imaging Using 11CO2.

Authors:  Jens Mincke; Jan Courtyn; Christian Vanhove; Stefaan Vandenberghe; Kathy Steppe
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 5.753

7.  Technical note: how to determine the FDG activity for tumour PET imaging that satisfies European guidelines.

Authors:  Daniëlle Koopman; Jochen A C van Osch; Pieter L Jager; Carlijn J A Tenbergen; Siert Knollema; Cornelis H Slump; Jorn A van Dalen
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2016-09-29

8.  Towards guidelines to harmonize textural features in PET: Haralick textural features vary with image noise, but exposure-invariant domains enable comparable PET radiomics.

Authors:  George Amadeus Prenosil; Thilo Weitzel; Markus Fürstner; Michael Hentschel; Thomas Krause; Paul Cumming; Axel Rominger; Bernd Klaeser
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.