Literature DB >> 27798754

Semantic priming by irrelevant speech.

Jan P Röer1, Ulrike Körner2, Axel Buchner2, Raoul Bell2.   

Abstract

To-be-ignored, task-irrelevant speech disrupts serial recall performance relative to a quiet control condition. In most studies, the content of the auditory distractors had no effect on their disruptive potential, one's own name being one of the few exceptions. There are two possible explanations of this pattern: (1) Semantic features of the irrelevant speech are usually not processed, except for highly relevant auditory distractors, or (2) semantic processing of the irrelevant speech always occurs, but usually does not affect serial recall performance. To test these explanations, we presented to-be-ignored auditory distractor words drawn from different categories while participants memorized visual targets for serial recall. Afterwards, participants were invited to what they believed to be an unrelated norming study, in which they were required to spontaneously produce words from the categories from which the auditory distractor words were drawn. Previously ignored words were produced with a higher probability than words from a parallel, nonpresented set, demonstrating that features of to-be-ignored, task-irrelevant speech that do not interfere with immediate serial recall performance are nevertheless processed semantically and may have substantial effects on subsequent behavior.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attentional capture; Semantic priming; Short-term memory; Working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27798754     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-016-1186-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  14 in total

1.  A differential brain response to the subject's own name persists during sleep.

Authors:  F Perrin; L García-Larrea; F Mauguière; H Bastuji
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 2.  The role of sensory modality in age-related distraction: a critical review and a renewed view.

Authors:  Maria J S Guerreiro; Dana R Murphy; Pascal W M Van Gerven
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Predictability and distraction: Does the neural model represent postcategorical features?

Authors:  John E Marsh; Jan P Röer; Raoul Bell; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Psych J       Date:  2014-03

4.  Valence of distractor words increases the effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall.

Authors:  Axel Buchner; Klaus Rothermund; Dirk Wentura; Bettina Mehl
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-07

5.  Interference by process, not content, determines semantic auditory distraction.

Authors:  John E Marsh; Robert W Hughes; Dylan M Jones
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2008-12-10

6.  Contrasting effects of changing rhythm and content on auditory distraction in immediate memory.

Authors:  Fabrice B R Parmentier; C Philip Beaman
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2014-12-08

7.  Specific foreknowledge reduces auditory distraction by irrelevant speech.

Authors:  Jan Philipp Röer; Raoul Bell; Axel Buchner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Semantic processing and memory for attended and unattended words in dichotic listening: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  S Bentin; M Kutas; S A Hillyard
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Evidence for habituation of the irrelevant-sound effect on serial recall.

Authors:  Jan P Röer; Raoul Bell; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-05

10.  What determines auditory distraction? On the roles of local auditory changes and expectation violations.

Authors:  Jan P Röer; Raoul Bell; Axel Buchner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  Auditory distraction does more than disrupt rehearsal processes in children's serial recall.

Authors:  Angela M AuBuchon; Corey I McGill; Emily M Elliott
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-05

2.  Preserved sensory processing but hampered conflict detection when stimulus input is task-irrelevant.

Authors:  Tristan Bekinschtein; Simon van Gaal; Stijn Adriaan Nuiten; Andrés Canales-Johnson; Lola Beerendonk; Nutsa Nanuashvili; Johannes Jacobus Fahrenfort
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Effects of Auditory Distraction on Face Memory.

Authors:  Raoul Bell; Laura Mieth; Jan Philipp Röer; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Negative target stimuli do not influence cross-modal auditory distraction.

Authors:  Saskia Kaiser; Axel Buchner; Laura Mieth; Raoul Bell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 3.752

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.