Literature DB >> 16248331

Coherence of the irrelevant-sound effect: individual profiles of short-term memory and susceptibility to task-irrelevant materials.

Emily M Elliott1, Nelson Cowan.   

Abstract

We examined individual and developmental differences in the disruptive effects of irrelevant sounds on serial recall of printed lists. In Experiment 1, we examined adults (N = 205) receiving eight-item lists to be recalled. Although their susceptibility to disruption of recall by irrelevant sounds was only slightly related to memory span, regression analyses documented highly reliable individual differences in this susceptibility across speech and tone distractors, even with variance from span level removed. In Experiment 2, we examined adults (n = 64) and 8-year-old children (n = 63) receiving lists of a length equal to a predetermined span and one item shorter (span-1). We again found significant relationships between measures of span and susceptibility to irrelevant sounds, although in only two of the measures. We conclude that some of the cognitive processes helpful in performing a span task may not be beneficial in the presence of irrelevant sounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16248331      PMCID: PMC2669750          DOI: 10.3758/bf03195333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  16 in total

Review 1.  Interference in memory by process or content? A reply to Neath (2000)

Authors:  D M Jones; S Tremblay
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-09

2.  The phonological loop and the irrelevant speech effect: some comments on Neath (2000).

Authors:  A D Baddeley
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-09

Review 3.  Modeling the effects of irrelevant speech on memory.

Authors:  I Neath
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-09

4.  The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity.

Authors:  N Cowan
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 12.579

5.  The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: the importance of working memory capacity.

Authors:  A R Conway; N Cowan; M F Bunting
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-06

6.  The irrelevant-speech effect and children: theoretical implications of developmental change.

Authors:  Emily M Elliott
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-04

7.  Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: the contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference.

Authors:  Michael J Kane; Randall W Engle
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2003-03

8.  Valence of distractor words increases the effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall.

Authors:  Axel Buchner; Klaus Rothermund; Dirk Wentura; Bettina Mehl
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-07

9.  The nature of cross-modal color-word interference effects.

Authors:  E M Elliott; N Cowan; F Valle-Inclan
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1998-07

10.  Irrelevant sound disrupts order information in free recall as in serial recall.

Authors:  C P Beaman; D M Jones
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1998-08
View more
  12 in total

1.  High working memory capacity attenuates the deviation effect but not the changing-state effect: further support for the duplex-mechanism account of auditory distraction.

Authors:  Patrik Sörqvist
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-07

2.  Equivalent irrelevant-sound effects for old and young adults.

Authors:  Raoul Bell; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-03

3.  What causes auditory distraction?

Authors:  William J Macken; Fiona G Phelps; Dylan M Jones
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-02

4.  Suppression effects on musical and verbal memory.

Authors:  Zachary A Schendel; Caroline Palmer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-06

Review 5.  High working memory capacity does not always attenuate distraction: Bayesian evidence in support of the null hypothesis.

Authors:  Patrik Sörqvist; John E Marsh; Anatole Nöstl
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-10

Review 6.  Does noise affect learning? A short review on noise effects on cognitive performance in children.

Authors:  Maria Klatte; Kirstin Bergström; Thomas Lachmann
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-08-30

7.  The effects of distraction on metacognition and metacognition on distraction: evidence from recognition memory.

Authors:  C Philip Beaman; Maciej Hanczakowski; Dylan M Jones
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-05-14

8.  Individual differences in distractibility: An update and a model.

Authors:  Patrik Sörqvist; Jerker Rönnberg
Journal:  Psych J       Date:  2014-03-10

9.  Effects of Auditory Distraction on Face Memory.

Authors:  Raoul Bell; Laura Mieth; Jan Philipp Röer; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Children's Recall of Words Spoken in Their First and Second Language: Effects of Signal-to-Noise Ratio and Reverberation Time.

Authors:  Anders Hurtig; Marijke Keus van de Poll; Elina P Pekkola; Staffan Hygge; Robert Ljung; Patrik Sörqvist
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-01-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.