Literature DB >> 2945899

The unattended speech effect: perception or memory?

A Baddeley, P Salamé.   

Abstract

Broadbent (1983) has suggested that the influence of unattended speech on immediate serial recall is a perceptual phenomenon rather than a memory phenomenon. In order to test this, subjects were required to classify visually presented pairs of consonants on the basis of either case or rhyme. They were tested both in silence and against a background of continuous spoken Arabic presented at 75 dB(A). No effect of unattended speech was observed on either the speed or accuracy of processing. A further study required subjects to decide whether visually presented nonwords were homophonous with real words. Again, performance was not impaired by unattended speech, although a clear effect was observed on an immediate serial memory task. Our results give no support to the perceptual interpretation of the unattended speech effect.

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 2945899     DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.12.4.525

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  14 in total

Review 1.  Interference in memory by process or content? A reply to Neath (2000)

Authors:  D M Jones; S Tremblay
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-09

2.  The phonological loop and the irrelevant speech effect: some comments on Neath (2000).

Authors:  A D Baddeley
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-09

Review 3.  Modeling the effects of irrelevant speech on memory.

Authors:  I Neath
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-09

4.  Valence of distractor words increases the effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall.

Authors:  Axel Buchner; Klaus Rothermund; Dirk Wentura; Bettina Mehl
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-07

5.  Duration estimation and the phonological loop: articulatory suppression and irrelevant sounds.

Authors:  Vicky Franssen; André Vandierendonck; Alain Van Hiel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-07-07

6.  Irrelevant speech effects and sequence learning.

Authors:  Lisa A Farley; Ian Neath; David W Allbritton; Aimée M Surprenant
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-01

7.  Equivalent irrelevant-sound effects for old and young adults.

Authors:  Raoul Bell; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-03

Review 8.  Auditory distractor processing in sequential selection tasks.

Authors:  Christian Frings; Katja Kerstin Schneider; Birte Moeller
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-11-21

9.  The phonological loop model of working memory: an ERP study of irrelevant speech and phonological similarity effects.

Authors:  M Martín-Loeches; S R Schweinberger; W Sommer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-07

10.  Mapping the brain network of the phonological loop.

Authors:  Costanza Papagno; Alessandro Comi; Marco Riva; Alberto Bizzi; Mirta Vernice; Alessandra Casarotti; Enrica Fava; Lorenzo Bello
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.