Literature DB >> 1548447

Sign- versus goal-tracking: effects of conditioned-stimulus-to-unconditioned-stimulus distance.

F J Silva1, K M Silva, J J Pear.   

Abstract

Three pigeons were exposed sequentially across experimental phases to five different distances between the conditioned stimulus and the site of the unconditioned stimulus in a sign-/goal-tracking procedure. A computer-controlled tracking system provided a continuous record of the bird's position by continuously monitoring the location of the bird's head in three-dimensional space. It was found that birds sign-tracked (i.e., approached the conditioned stimulus) when the conditioned stimulus was closest to the site of the unconditioned stimulus, goal-tracked (i.e., approached the site of the unconditioned stimulus in the presence of the conditioned stimulus) when the conditioned stimulus was farthest from the site of the unconditioned stimulus, and engaged in both sign- and goal-tracking (or something intermediate) at intermediate conditioned-stimulus-to-unconditioned-stimulus distances. When both sign- and goal-tracking occurred, the former tended to occur in the first half and the latter in the second half of the interval in which the conditioned stimulus was present. The results suggest (a) whether sign- or goal-tracking (or both) occurs is a function of the distance of the conditioned stimulus from the site of the unconditioned stimulus, (b) the fact that pigeons but not rats have been found to sign-track consistently throughout the duration of the conditioned stimulus may be due to quantitatively rather than qualitatively different effects of conditioned-stimulus-to-unconditioned-stimulus distance across species (i.e., a "short" conditioned-stimulus-to-unconditioned-stimulus distance for a pigeon may be a "long" one for a rat), and (c) sign- and goal-tracking may be competing behavioral tendencies that can (e.g., at intermediate conditioned-stimulus-to-unconditioned-stimulus distances) cancel each other out. The findings lend support to theories that specify an interaction between phylogenetic and reinforcement variables in determining whether sign- or goal-tracking will occur in any given experimental preparation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1548447      PMCID: PMC1323066          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1992.57-17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  15 in total

1.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Centrifugal selection of signal-directed pecking.

Authors:  F J Barrera
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Spatiotemporal patterns of behavior produced by variable-interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  J J Pear
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Behavioral stereotypy and the generalized matching equation.

Authors:  J J Pear
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  The operant-respondent distinction: Future directions.

Authors:  J J Pear; G D Eldridge
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Auto-maintenance in the pigeon: sustained pecking despite contingent non-reinforcement.

Authors:  D R Williams; H Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Effects of varying stimulus disparity and the reinforcer ratio in concurrent-schedule and signal-detection procedures.

Authors:  B Alsop; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Autoshaping in the rat: The effects of localizable visual and auditory signals for food.

Authors:  G G Cleland; G C Davey
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Autoshaping in the rat: Effects of omission on the form of the response.

Authors:  G C Davey; D Oakley; G G Cleland
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Differential effects of omission contingencies on various components of Pavlovian appetitive conditioned responding in rats.

Authors:  P C Holland
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1979-04
View more
  25 in total

1.  The spatial distribution of behavior under varying frequencies of temporally scheduled water delivery.

Authors:  E Ribes-Iñesta; C Torres
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Complex dynamic processes in sign tracking with an omission contingency (negative automaintenance).

Authors:  Peter R Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2003-01

3.  A behavior systems view of the organization of multiple responses during a partially or continuously reinforced interfood clock.

Authors:  Kathleen M Silva; William Timberlake
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  Discrimination training, partial reinforcement, and increases in intertrial interval all reduce response speed in a continuously reinforced key-pecking task.

Authors:  S Reilly; E M Macphail
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Individual differences in the propensity to approach signals vs goals promote different adaptations in the dopamine system of rats.

Authors:  Shelly B Flagel; Stanley J Watson; Terry E Robinson; Huda Akil
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 6.  Individual differences in the attribution of incentive salience to reward-related cues: Implications for addiction.

Authors:  Shelly B Flagel; Huda Akil; Terry E Robinson
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2008-06-21       Impact factor: 5.250

7.  Observation of behavior, inference of function, and the study of learning.

Authors:  W Timberlake; F J Silva
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-03

8.  Mechanisms underlying the effects of unsignaled delayed reinforcement on key pecking of pigeons under variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  D W Schaal; T A Shahan; C A Kovera; M P Reilly
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 9.  Adjunctive behaviors are operants.

Authors:  Peter R Killeen; Ricardo Pellón
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.986

10.  Effects of prior amphetamine exposure on approach strategy in appetitive Pavlovian conditioning in rats.

Authors:  Nicholas W Simon; Ian A Mendez; Barry Setlow
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2008-10-11       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.