Literature DB >> 15971497

A behavior systems view of the organization of multiple responses during a partially or continuously reinforced interfood clock.

Kathleen M Silva1, William Timberlake.   

Abstract

We examined how a 50% Pavlovian partial reinforcement (PRF) schedule, versus a 100% continuous reinforcement (CRF) schedule, altered the asymptotic amount and distribution of focal and general search behavior in rats during 48-sec trials with and without a four-segment interfood clock (S1-S2-S3-S4-US). Under CRF, but not PRF, average asymptotic focal search (nosing in the feeder) increased across the last two clock segments (S3 and S4), and more for the clock group than the no-clock group. Locomotor general search peaked in the second clock segment (S2) for the CRF-clock and CRF-no-clock groups and in S3 for the PRF-clock groups. Furthermore, the ratio of general search to maximum focal search was higher for the PRF-clock group than for the CRF-clock group. This pattern of results supports the view that predictable reward presentations temporally organize search states and related responses between food presentations. The relative expression of these responses varies with the predictability and proximity of reward and is more sharply defined in the presence of a clock.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15971497     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  25 in total

1.  Sign tracking versus goal tracking in the sexual conditioning of male Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica).

Authors:  M Burns; M Domjan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1996-07

2.  Serial conditioning as a function of stimulus, response, and temporal dependencies.

Authors:  W L Palya; R A Bevins
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Behavior induced by periodic food delivery: The effects of interfood interval.

Authors:  N K Innis; V L Simmelhag-Grant; J E Staddon
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Escape from serial stimuli leading to food.

Authors:  J A Dinsmoor; D M Lee; M M Brown
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  The autoshaping procedure as a residual block clock.

Authors:  J A Dinsmoor; J D Dougan; J Pfister; E Thiels
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Observation of behavior, inference of function, and the study of learning.

Authors:  W Timberlake; F J Silva
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-03

7.  Topography of signal-centered behavior in the rat: Effects of deprivation state and reinforcer type.

Authors:  G C Davey; G G Cleland
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Amsel's frustration effect: a pavlovian replication with control for frequency and distribution of rewards.

Authors:  R T Dudley; M R Papini
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1997-04

9.  The temporal organization of behavior on periodic food schedules.

Authors:  A K Reid; G Bacha; C Morán
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Sign- versus goal-tracking: effects of conditioned-stimulus-to-unconditioned-stimulus distance.

Authors:  F J Silva; K M Silva; J J Pear
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  6 in total

1.  Time and Associative Learning.

Authors:  Peter D Balsam; Michael R Drew; C R Gallistel
Journal:  Comp Cogn Behav Rev       Date:  2010

Review 2.  Timing and anticipation: conceptual and methodological approaches.

Authors:  Peter Balsam; Hugo Sanchez-Castillo; Kathleen Taylor; Heather Van Volkinburg; Ryan D Ward
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2009-10-26       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 3.  Time to rethink the neural mechanisms of learning and memory.

Authors:  Charles R Gallistel; Peter D Balsam
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 2.877

4.  Acquisition of "Start" and "Stop" response thresholds in peak-interval timing is differentially sensitive to protein synthesis inhibition in the dorsal and ventral striatum.

Authors:  Christopher J Macdonald; Ruey-Kuang Cheng; Warren H Meck
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-14

5.  Do rats learn conditional independence?

Authors:  Robert Ian Bowers; William Timberlake
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 2.963

Review 6.  Space, time, and context drive anticipatory behavior: Considerations for understanding the behavior of animals in human care.

Authors:  Bethany L Krebs; Karli R Chudeau; Caitlin L Eschmann; Celina W Tu; Eridia Pacheco; Jason V Watters
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-09-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.