Literature DB >> 16811370

Auto-maintenance in the pigeon: sustained pecking despite contingent non-reinforcement.

D R Williams, H Williams.   

Abstract

If a response key is regularly illuminated for several seconds before food is presented, pigeons will peck it after a moderate number of pairings; this "auto-shaping" procedure of Brown and Jenkins (1968) was explored further in the present series of four experiments. The first showed that pecking was maintained even when pecks turned off the key and prevented reinforcement (auto-maintenance); the second controlled for possible effects of generalization and stimulus change. Two other experiments explored procedures that manipulated the tendency to peck the negatively correlated key by introducing alternative response keys which had no scheduled consequences. The results indicate that pecking can be established and maintained by certain stimulus-reinforcer relationships, independent of explicit or adventitious contingencies between response and reinforcer.

Year:  1969        PMID: 16811370      PMCID: PMC1338642          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-511

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  4 in total

1.  Conditioned and unconditioned aggression in pigeons.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS; A C CATANIA; B F SKINNER
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck.

Authors:  P L Brown; H M Jenkins
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Relation between response amplitude and reinforcement.

Authors:  D R Williams
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1966-05

4.  Conditioning of the aggressive behavior of pigeons by a fixed-interval schedule of reinforcement.

Authors:  N H Azrin; R R Hutchinson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-07       Impact factor: 2.468

  4 in total
  155 in total

1.  Tolerance to the effects of cocaine on performance under behavior-correlated reinforcement magnitude.

Authors:  M L Miller; G W Brodkorb; M N Branch
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Drug effects on the performance of pigeons under a negative automaintenance schedule.

Authors:  A Poling; J B Appel
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1979-01-31       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Complex dynamic processes in sign tracking with an omission contingency (negative automaintenance).

Authors:  Peter R Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2003-01

4.  Economic and biological influences on key pecking and treadle pressing in pigeons.

Authors:  Leonard Green; Daniel D Holt
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Selective sensitivity of schedule-induced activity to an operant suppression contingency.

Authors:  R W Allan; T J Matthews
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Rethinking reinforcement: allocation, induction, and contingency.

Authors:  William M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  The gifts of culture and of eloquence: An open letter to Michael J. Mahoney in reply to his article, "Scientific psychology and radical behaviorism".

Authors:  A C Catania
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1991

8.  The experimental analysis of human behavior: indispensable, ancillary, or irrelevant?

Authors:  A Baron; M Perone; M Galizio
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1991

9.  Selected publication trends in JEAB: Implications for the vitality of the experimental analysis of behavior.

Authors:  Bryan K Saville; L Kimberly Epting; William Buskist
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2002

Review 10.  Dopamine reward circuitry: two projection systems from the ventral midbrain to the nucleus accumbens-olfactory tubercle complex.

Authors:  Satoshi Ikemoto
Journal:  Brain Res Rev       Date:  2007-05-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.