Literature DB >> 16812402

The operant-respondent distinction: Future directions.

J J Pear, G D Eldridge.   

Abstract

The operant-respondent distinction has provided a major organizing framework for the data generated through the experimental analysis of behavior. Problems have been encountered, however, in using it as an explanatory concept for such phenomena as avoidance and conditioned suppression. Data now exist that do not fit neatly into the framework. Moreover, the discovery of autoshaping has highlighted difficulties in isolating the two types of behavior and conditioning. Despite these problems, the operant-respondent framework remains the most successful paradigm currently available for organizing behavioral data. Research and theoretical efforts should therefore probably be directed to modifying the framework to account for disparate data.

Year:  1984        PMID: 16812402      PMCID: PMC1348115          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1984.42-453

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  34 in total

1.  Temporal relationship between salivation and lever pressing with differential reinforcement of low rates.

Authors:  M M SHAPIRO
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1962-08

2.  Frequency of reinforcement as a parameter of conditioned suppression.

Authors:  D O LYON
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Production of polydipsia in normal rats by an intermittent food schedule.

Authors:  J L FALK
Journal:  Science       Date:  1961-01-20       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Respondent salivary conditioning during operant lever pressing in dogs.

Authors:  M M SHAPIRO
Journal:  Science       Date:  1960-09-02       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Maintenance of avoidance behavior by unavoidable shocks.

Authors:  M SIDMAN; R J HERRNSTEIN; D G CONRAD
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1957-12

6.  Traumatic avoidance learning: the principles of anxiety conservation and partial irreversibility.

Authors:  R L SOLOMON; L C WYNNE
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1954-11       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Contiguity vs. drive-reduction in conditioned fear: the proximity and abruptness of drive-reduction.

Authors:  O H MOWRER; L N SOLOMON
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1954-03

8.  Traumatic avoidance learning: the outcomes of several extinction procedures with dogs.

Authors:  R L SOLOMON; L J KAMIN; L C WYNNE
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1953-04

9.  Behavior induced by periodic food delivery: The effects of interfood interval.

Authors:  N K Innis; V L Simmelhag-Grant; J E Staddon
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 10.  Is adjunctive behavior a third class of behavior?

Authors:  C L Wetherington
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 8.989

View more
  10 in total

1.  Spatiotemporal patterns of behavior produced by variable-interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  J J Pear
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Shaping by automated tracking of an arbitrary operant response.

Authors:  J J Pear; J A Legris
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Topographical variations in behavior during autoshaping, automaintenance, and omission training.

Authors:  G D Eldridge; J J Pear
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Algorithmic shaping and misbehavior in the acquisition of token deposit by rats.

Authors:  M Midgley; S E Lea; R M Kirby
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Autoshaping and automaintenance: a neural-network approach.

Authors:  José E Burgos
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Behavior systems, associationism, and Pavlovian conditioning.

Authors:  W Timberlake
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-12

7.  Stimulus class membership established via stimulus-reinforcer relations.

Authors:  W V Dube; W J McIlvane; H A Mackay; L T Stoddard
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Translations in Stimulus-Stimulus Pairing: Autoshaping of Learner Vocalizations.

Authors:  Stephanie P da Silva; April Michele Williams
Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci       Date:  2019-11-25

Review 9.  A selectionist approach to reinforcement.

Authors:  J W Donahoe; J E Burgos; D C Palmer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Sign- versus goal-tracking: effects of conditioned-stimulus-to-unconditioned-stimulus distance.

Authors:  F J Silva; K M Silva; J J Pear
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.468

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.