Literature DB >> 1940764

Effects of varying stimulus disparity and the reinforcer ratio in concurrent-schedule and signal-detection procedures.

B Alsop1, M Davison.   

Abstract

The present study measured the effects of stimulus and reinforcer variations on pigeons' behavior in two different choice procedures. Two intensities of white light were presented as the stimuli on the main key in a switching-key concurrent schedule and as the sample stimuli in a signal-detection procedure. Under both procedures, the scheduled rate of reinforcement was varied across conditions to produce various ratios of obtained reinforcement. These ratios were obtained for seven pairs of light intensities. In the concurrent schedules, the effects of reinforcer-ratio variations were positively correlated with the physical disparity between the two light intensities. In the signal-detection procedure, changes in the reinforcer ratio produced greater effects on performance when stimulus disparity was very low or very high compared to those found at intermediate levels of stimulus disparity. This discrepancy creates a dilemma for existing behavioral models of signal-detection performance.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1940764      PMCID: PMC1323083          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1991.56-67

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  18 in total

1.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Preference and Switching under Concurrent Scheduling.

Authors:  J D Findley
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1958-04       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Concurrent responding with fixed relative rate of reinforcement.

Authors:  D A Stubbs; S S Pliskoff
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The relation between the generalized matching law and signal-detection theory.

Authors:  M C Davison; R D Tustin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Sensitivity to reinforcement in concurrent arithmetic and exponential schedules.

Authors:  R Taylor; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Undermatching and overmatching as deviations from the matching law.

Authors:  J H Wearden
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Superimposition of response-independent reinforcement.

Authors:  I S Burgess; J H Wearden
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  The role of discriminative stimuli in concurrent performances.

Authors:  G Bourland; J T Miller
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Concurrent-schedule performance: Effects of relative and overall reinforcer rate.

Authors:  B Alsop; D Elliffe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Matching, undermatching, and overmatching in studies of choice.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  29 in total

1.  Psychophysics of remembering.

Authors:  K G White; J T Wixted
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Effects of response disparity on stimulus and reinforcer control in human detection tasks.

Authors:  S Gallagher; B Alsop
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Quantitative analyses of matching-to-sample performance.

Authors:  B M Jones
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Contingency discriminability, matching, and bias in the concurrent-schedule responding of possums (Trichosurus vulpecula).

Authors:  Angela Bron; Catherine E Sumpter; T Mary Foster; William Temple
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Strict and random alternation in concurrent variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  Douglas Elliffe; Michael Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Rapid acquisition of bias in signal detection: dynamics of effective reinforcement allocation.

Authors:  Blake A Hutsell; Eric A Jacobs
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Signal-detection analyses of conditional discrimination and delayed matching-to-sample performance.

Authors:  Brent Alsop
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Types of responding in a signal-detection task.

Authors:  B Alsop; R Rowley
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Discriminability between alternatives in a switching-key concurrent schedule.

Authors:  B Alsop; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  A quantitative analysis of extreme choice.

Authors:  M Davison; B M Jones
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.