Literature DB >> 16811798

Centrifugal selection of signal-directed pecking.

F J Barrera.   

Abstract

Pigeons were exposed to a schedule of stimulus-correlated food presentations. When key pecks terminated trial signals and cancelled the delivery of food, pecking was either gradually or rapidly redirected away from the keys, depending on whether the food-omission contingency was introduced from the outset or after exposure to a response-independent baseline. In all cases, the food-omission contingency substantially reduced or eliminated pecking at the keys.

Year:  1974        PMID: 16811798      PMCID: PMC1333275          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-341

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  13 in total

1.  ESCAPE FROM A STIMULUS ASSOCIATED WITH BOTH REWARD AND PUNISHMENT.

Authors:  E HEARST
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1963-12

2.  The effects of reinforcement upon the prepecking behaviors of pigeons in the autoshaping experiment.

Authors:  M G Wessells
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The role of the response-reinforcer contingency in negative automaintenance.

Authors:  B Schwartz; D R Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Enhancement of off-key pecking by on-key punishment.

Authors:  P J Dunham; A Mariner; H Adams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Two different kinds of key peck in the pigeon: some properties of responses maintained by negative and positive response-reinforcer contingencies.

Authors:  B Schwartz; D R Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Punishment by response-contingent withdrawal of an imprinted stimulus.

Authors:  H S Hoffman; J W Stratton; V Newby
Journal:  Science       Date:  1969-02-14       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Conditioned Approach and Contact Behavior toward Signals for Food or Brain-Stimulation Reinforcement.

Authors:  G B Peterson; J E Ackilt; G P Frommer; E S Hearst
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-09-15       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Food-avoidance in hungry pigeons, and other perplexities.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein; D H Loveland
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-11       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck.

Authors:  P L Brown; H M Jenkins
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  A simple method of obtaining a scatter distribution of off-key pigeon pecking.

Authors:  A J Bachrach
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-03       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  20 in total

1.  Drug effects on the performance of pigeons under a negative automaintenance schedule.

Authors:  A Poling; J B Appel
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1979-01-31       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Selective sensitivity of schedule-induced activity to an operant suppression contingency.

Authors:  R W Allan; T J Matthews
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Generalization peak shift for autoshaped and operant key pecks.

Authors:  S J Weiss; R D Weissman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The compleat associationist: a review of N. J. Mackintosh's The Psychology of Animal Learning.

Authors:  R G Weisman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Temporal distributions of responding during discrete-trial omission training in rats.

Authors:  M F O'connell
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  The associative relation underlying autoshaping in the pigeon.

Authors:  G Woodruff; D R Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Behavioral stereotypy and the generalized matching equation.

Authors:  J J Pear
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Effect of varying the duration of grain presentation on automaintenance.

Authors:  P D Balsam; A J Brownstein; R L Shull
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Responding under positive and negative response contingencies in pigeons and crows.

Authors:  R W Powell; W Kelly
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Topographical variations in behavior during autoshaping, automaintenance, and omission training.

Authors:  G D Eldridge; J J Pear
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.