Literature DB >> 16812336

Autoshaping in the rat: The effects of localizable visual and auditory signals for food.

G G Cleland, G C Davey.   

Abstract

Two experiments investigated autoshaping in rats to localizable visual and auditory conditioned stimuli predicting response-independent food. In Experiment 1 considerable conditioned-stimulus approach behavior was generated by a localizable visual conditioned stimulus that was situated approximately 35 cm from the food tray. Using the same apparatus in Experiment 2 we found that the conditioned-stimulus approach was generated only to a visual conditioned stimulus and not to a localizable auditory conditioned stimulus even though subjects (1) could discriminate presentations of the auditory conditioned stimulus, (2) had associated it with food, (3) could localize it, and (4) would approach the auditory stimulus if this behavior constituted an instrumental response to food. The predominant conditioned responses to the auditory stimuli were goal tracking (entering the food tray) and orienting towards the food-paired conditioned stimulus by head turning and rearing and turning. These results imply that rats do not invariably approach a localizable appetitive Pavlovian conditioned stimulus but that stimulus-approach responses depend on the nature and modality of the conditioned stimulus.

Entities:  

Year:  1983        PMID: 16812336      PMCID: PMC1347843          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1983.40-47

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  15 in total

1.  Controls for and constraints on auto-shaping.

Authors:  J Bilbrey; S Winokur
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Lever-contact responses in rats: automaintenance with and without a negative response-reinforcer dependency.

Authors:  M Stiers; A Silberberg
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Stimulus- and response-reinforcer contingencies in autoshaping, operant, classical, and omission training procedures in rats.

Authors:  G W Atnip
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  A procedure for autoshaping the pigeon's key peck to an auditory stimulus.

Authors:  G D Steinhauer; G H Davol; A Lee
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Autoshaping, random control, and omission training in the rat.

Authors:  C Locurto; H S Terrace; J Gibbon
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck.

Authors:  P L Brown; H M Jenkins
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Conditioned stimulus as a determinant of the form of the Pavlovian conditioned response.

Authors:  P C Holland
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1977-01

8.  The "where is it?" reflex: autoshaping the orienting response.

Authors:  G Buzsáki
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Influence of visual conditioned stimulus characteristics on the form of Pavlovian appetitive conditioned responding in rats.

Authors:  P C Holland
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1980-01

10.  Response selection properties of food and brain-stimulation reinforcers in rats.

Authors:  G B Peterson
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1975-06
View more
  24 in total

Review 1.  The Origins and Organization of Vertebrate Pavlovian Conditioning.

Authors:  Michael S Fanselow; Kate M Wassum
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 2.  Individual differences in the attribution of incentive salience to reward-related cues: Implications for addiction.

Authors:  Shelly B Flagel; Huda Akil; Terry E Robinson
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2008-06-21       Impact factor: 5.250

3.  The ability for cocaine and cocaine-associated cues to compete for attention.

Authors:  Kyle K Pitchers; Taylor R Wood; Cari J Skrzynski; Terry E Robinson; Martin Sarter
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Translations in Stimulus-Stimulus Pairing: Autoshaping of Learner Vocalizations.

Authors:  Stephanie P da Silva; April Michele Williams
Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci       Date:  2019-11-25

5.  Nucleus accumbens core dopamine signaling tracks the need-based motivational value of food-paired cues.

Authors:  Tara J Aitken; Venuz Y Greenfield; Kate M Wassum
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  2016-01-24       Impact factor: 5.372

6.  Stimulus-food pairings produce stimulus-directed touch-screen responding in cynomolgus monkeys (macaca fascicularis) with or without a positive response contingency.

Authors:  Christopher E Bullock; Todd M Myers
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 7.  On the motivational properties of reward cues: Individual differences.

Authors:  Terry E Robinson; Lindsay M Yager; Elizabeth S Cogan; Benjamin T Saunders
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 5.250

8.  A classically conditioned cocaine cue acquires greater control over motivated behavior in rats prone to attribute incentive salience to a food cue.

Authors:  Lindsay M Yager; Terry E Robinson
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Sign- versus goal-tracking: effects of conditioned-stimulus-to-unconditioned-stimulus distance.

Authors:  F J Silva; K M Silva; J J Pear
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Occasion setting by drug states: Functional equivalence following similar training history.

Authors:  Matthew I Palmatier; Rick A Bevins
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.