Literature DB >> 16812551

Behavioral stereotypy and the generalized matching equation.

J J Pear.   

Abstract

The development of behavioral stereotypy is a common result of exposure to both response-dependent and response-independent reinforcement procedures. The generalized matching equation and two dynamic versions of that equation, which take into account the time differential between reinforcements and their effect on behavior, predict this outcome of many procedures involving reinforcement. Following from the assumption that distinct response topographies, distinct response sequences, or orientations to distinct stimuli can be treated in the equations as distinct classes of behavior, the equations predict that-at least for matching and undermatching-the behavior class that is most biased relative to other behavior classes of the same type will tend to predominate to the exclusion or near exclusion of those behavior classes.

Year:  1988        PMID: 16812551      PMCID: PMC1338843          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1988.50-87

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  27 in total

1.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Variability of response location for pigeons responding under continuous reinforcement, intermittent reinforcement, and extinction.

Authors:  D A Eckerman; R N Lanson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Pavlovian conditioning with heat reinforcement produces stimulus-directed pecking in chicks.

Authors:  E A Wasserman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-08-31       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Response variability in the white rat during conditioning, extinction, and reconditioning.

Authors:  J J ANTONITIS
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1951-10

5.  The form of the auto-shaped response with food or water reinforcers.

Authors:  H M Jenkins; B R Moore
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck.

Authors:  P L Brown; H M Jenkins
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Preferences among stimulus matches in the pigeon.

Authors:  R Pisacreta
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  The basis of superstitious behavior: chance contingency, stimulus substitution, or appetitive behavior?

Authors:  W Timberlake; G A Lucas
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Concurrent schedules: undermatching and control by previous experimental conditions.

Authors:  M C Davison; I W Hunter
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Changeover delay and concurrent schedules: some effects on relative performance measures.

Authors:  R L Shull; S S Pliskoff
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  1 in total

1.  Sign- versus goal-tracking: effects of conditioned-stimulus-to-unconditioned-stimulus distance.

Authors:  F J Silva; K M Silva; J J Pear
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.468

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.