Literature DB >> 14964708

The resistance to change of observing.

Timothy A Shahan1, Adam Magee, Andria Dobberstein.   

Abstract

Observing responses produce contact with discriminative stimuli and have been considered analogous to attending. Many studies have examined the effects of reinforcement rate on the resistance to change of simple operant behavior, but nothing is known about the resistance to change of observing. Two experiments examined the effects of primary reinforcement rate on the resistance to change of observing behavior of pigeons. In Experiment 1, a multiple schedule of observing-response procedures was arranged. In a rich component, observing responses produced stimuli correlated with a high rate of random-interval (RI) reinforcement or extinction. In a lean component, observing responses produced stimuli correlated with a lower rate of RI reinforcement or extinction. In both components, observing responses produced the multiple-schedule stimuli on a fixed-interval 0.75-s schedule. In Experiment 2, a similar procedure was used, but observing in the rich and lean components produced schedule-correlated stimuli on an RI 15-s schedule. Observing in the rich component occurred at a higher rate and was more resistant to disruptions produced by presession feeding and response-independent food deliveries during intercomponent intervals. Despite more frequent observing during unsignaled periods of extinction than unsignaled periods of RI reinforcement, observing during extinction periods was less resistant to change. In addition, replicating the usual result, responding on the food key was generally more resistant to change in the presence of stimuli associated with higher reinforcement rates. These results suggest that quantitative descriptions of resistance to change derived with simple food-maintained responding may be applicable to observing, and perhaps by extension, to attending.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14964708      PMCID: PMC1284960          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2003.80-273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  24 in total

1.  Meta-analysis of cue-reactivity in addiction research.

Authors:  B L Carter; S T Tiffany
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 6.526

2.  Attentional bias associated with alcohol cues: differences between heavy and occasional social drinkers.

Authors:  J M Townshend; T Duka
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Comparing attentional bias to smoking cues in current smokers, former smokers, and non-smokers using a dot-probe task.

Authors:  Ronald N Ehrman; Steven J Robbins; Melissa A Bromwell; Megan E Lankford; John R Monterosso; Charles P O'Brien
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 4.492

4.  SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT AND RATE OF PRIMARY REINFORCEMENT.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  An integrative model for the study of behavioral momentum.

Authors:  J A Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Response strength in multiple schedules.

Authors:  J A Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  A test of the negative discriminative stimulus as a reinforcer of observing.

Authors:  J A Dinsmoor; M P Browne; C E Lawrence
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Resistance to change produced by access to fixed-delay versus variable-delay terminal links.

Authors:  R C Mellon; R L Shull
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Punishment of observing by the negative discriminative stimulus.

Authors:  D E Mulvaney; J A Dinsmoor; A R Jwaideh; L H Hughes
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Temporal generalization.

Authors:  R M Church; J Gibbon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1982-04
View more
  12 in total

1.  Resistance to change and relapse of observing.

Authors:  Eric A Thrailkill; Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 2.  Conditioned reinforcement and response strength.

Authors:  Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  A theory of attending and reinforcement in conditional discriminations.

Authors:  John A Nevin; Michael Davison; Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Resistance to change of forgetting functions and response rates.

Authors:  Amy L Odum; Timothy A Shahan; John A Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Rate of conditioned reinforcement affects observing rate but not resistance to change.

Authors:  Timothy A Shahan; Christopher A Podlesnik
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Disruption of responding maintained by conditioned reinforcement: alterations in response-conditioned-reinforcer relations.

Authors:  Gregory A Lieving; Mark P Reilly; Kennon A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 7.  Quantitative analyses of observing and attending.

Authors:  Timothy A Shahan; Christopher A Podlesnik
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 1.777

8.  Conditioned reinforcement value and resistance to change.

Authors:  Timothy A Shahan; Christopher A Podlesnik
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Baseline reinforcement rate and resurgence of destructive behavior.

Authors:  Wayne W Fisher; Valdeep Saini; Brian D Greer; William E Sullivan; Henry S Roane; Ashley M Fuhrman; Andrew R Craig; Ryan T Kimball
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 10.  The potential influence of stimulus overselectivity in AAC: information from eye tracking and behavioral studies of attention with individuals with intellectual disabilities.

Authors:  William V Dube; Krista M Wilkinson
Journal:  Augment Altern Commun       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 2.214

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.