Literature DB >> 18540215

Conditioned reinforcement value and resistance to change.

Timothy A Shahan1, Christopher A Podlesnik.   

Abstract

Three experiments examined the effects of conditioned reinforcement value and primary reinforcement rate on resistance to change using a multiple schedule of observing-response procedures with pigeons. In the absence of observing responses in both components, unsignaled periods of variable-interval (VI) schedule food reinforcement alternated with extinction. Observing responses in both components intermittently produced 15 s of a stimulus associated with the VI schedule (i.e., S+). In the first experiment, a lower-valued conditioned reinforcer and a higher rate of primary reinforcement were arranged in one component by adding response-independent food deliveries uncorrelated with S+. In the second experiment, one component arranged a lower valued conditioned reinforcer but a higher rate of primary reinforcement by increasing the probability of VI schedule periods relative to extinction periods. In the third experiment, the two observing-response components provided similar rates of primary reinforcement but arranged different valued conditioned reinforcers. Across the three experiments, observing-response rates were typically higher in the component associated with the higher valued conditioned reinforcer. Resistance to change was not affected by conditioned reinforcement value, but was an orderly function of the rate of primary reinforcement obtained in the two components. One interpretation of these results is that S+ value does not affect response strength and that S+ deliveries increase response rates through a mechanism other than reinforcement. Alternatively, because resistance to change depends on the discriminative stimulus-reinforcer relation, the failure of S+ value to impact resistance to change could have resulted from a lack of transfer of S+ value to the broader discriminative context.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18540215      PMCID: PMC2373769          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2008-89-263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  26 in total

1.  A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  M FLESHLER; H S HOFFMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Preference for conditioned reinforcement.

Authors:  B A Williams; R Dunn
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  An integrative model for the study of behavioral momentum.

Authors:  J A Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Response strength in multiple schedules.

Authors:  J A Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  A test of the negative discriminative stimulus as a reinforcer of observing.

Authors:  J A Dinsmoor; M P Browne; C E Lawrence
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Conditioned reinforcement as a function of duration of stimulus.

Authors:  J A Dinsmoor; D E Mulvaney; A R Jwaideh
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  The role of information in the emission of observing responses: a test of two hypotheses.

Authors:  R N Wilton; R O Clements
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Do conditional reinforcers count?

Authors:  Michael Davison; William M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Conditioned reinforcement: Neglected or outmoded explanatory construct?

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-12

10.  Alternative reinforcement increases resistance to change: Pavlovian or operant contingencies?

Authors:  J A Nevin; M E Tota; R D Torquato; R L Shull
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  9 in total

1.  Resistance to change and relapse of observing.

Authors:  Eric A Thrailkill; Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 2.  Conditioned reinforcement and response strength.

Authors:  Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Observing ben wyckoff: from basic research to programmed instruction and social issues.

Authors:  Rogelio Escobar; Kennon A Lattal
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2011

Review 4.  Quantitative analyses of observing and attending.

Authors:  Timothy A Shahan; Christopher A Podlesnik
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 1.777

5.  Go forth and be variable.

Authors:  Gregory J Madden
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2013

6.  A comparison of two pairing procedures to establish praise as a reinforcer.

Authors:  Claudia L Dozier; Brian A Iwata; Jessica Thomason-Sassi; April S Worsdell; David M Wilson
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2012

7.  Revisiting the role of bad news in maintaining human observing behavior.

Authors:  Edmund Fantino; Alan Silberberg
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  The generality of nicotine as a reinforcer enhancer in rats: effects on responding maintained by primary and conditioned reinforcers and resistance to extinction.

Authors:  Bethany R Raiff; Jesse Dallery
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2008-08-10       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Influence of conditioned reinforcement on the response-maintaining effects of quinpirole in rats.

Authors:  Gregory T Collins; James H Woods
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.293

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.