Literature DB >> 16811733

Punishment of observing by the negative discriminative stimulus.

D E Mulvaney, J A Dinsmoor, A R Jwaideh, L H Hughes.   

Abstract

To determine the effect of a negative discriminative stimulus on the response producing it, two pigeons were each studied in a three-key conditioning chamber. During alternating periods of unpredictable duration, pecking the center (food) key either was reinforced with grain on a variable-interval schedule or was never reinforced. On equal but independent variable-interval schedules, pecking either of the side (observing) keys changed the color of all keys for 30 sec from yellow to either green or red. When the schedule on the center key was variable-interval reinforcement, the color was green (positive discriminative stimulus); when no reinforcements were scheduled, the color was red (negative discriminative stimulus). Since pecking the side keys did not affect grain deliveries, changes in the rate of pecking could not be ascribed to changes in the frequency of primary reinforcement. In subsequent sessions, red was withheld as one of the possible consequences of pecking a given side key. When red was omitted, the rate on that key increased, and when red was restored, the rate decreased. It was concluded that red illumination of the keys, the negative discriminative stimulus, had a suppressive effect on the response that produced it.

Year:  1974        PMID: 16811733      PMCID: PMC1333168          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1974.21-37

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  12 in total

1.  Aversive aspects of a schedule of positive reinforcement.

Authors:  J B APPEL
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Time-out from positive reinforcement.

Authors:  N H AZRIN
Journal:  Science       Date:  1961-02-10       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  PUNISHMENT BY SD ASSOCIATED WITH FIXED-RATIO REINFORCEMENT.

Authors:  D M THOMPSON
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1965-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Uncertainty and conflict: a point of contact between information-theory and behavior-theory concepts.

Authors:  D E BERLYNE
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1957-11       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  A test of the negative discriminative stimulus as a reinforcer of observing.

Authors:  J A Dinsmoor; M P Browne; C E Lawrence
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Some effects of response-dependent clock stimuli in a fixed-interval schedule.

Authors:  S B Kendall
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Observing stimulus sources that signal food or no food.

Authors:  H M Jenkins; R A Boakes
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  The role of information in the emission of observing responses: a test of two hypotheses.

Authors:  R N Wilton; R O Clements
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Suppression of behavior by timeout punishment when suppression results in loss of positive reinforcement.

Authors:  A Kaufman; A Baron
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  ESCAPE FROM SD ASSOCIATED WITH FIXED-RATIO REINFORCEMENT.

Authors:  D M THOMPSON
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-01       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  31 in total

1.  The generality of selective observing.

Authors:  Scott T Gaynor; Richard L Shull
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  The resistance to change of observing.

Authors:  Timothy A Shahan; Adam Magee; Andria Dobberstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Judgment and decision making: Behavioral approaches.

Authors:  E Fantino
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1998

4.  Observing responses and serial stimuli: searching for the reinforcing properties of the S-.

Authors:  Rogelio Escobar; Carlos A Bruner
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 5.  Conditioned reinforcement and response strength.

Authors:  Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Effects of reinforcer probability, delay, and response requirements on the choices of rats and pigeons: possible species differences.

Authors:  James E Mazur
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  The delay-reduction hypothesis of conditioned reinforcement and punishment: Observing behavior.

Authors:  D A Case; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Freedom and knowledge: an experimental analysis of preference in pigeons.

Authors:  A C Catania
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Does contingent reinforcement strengthen operant behavior?

Authors:  J A Nevin; L D Smith; J Roberts
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Separating the effects of salience and disparity on the rate of observing.

Authors:  J A Dinsmoor; C A Bowe; D L Dout; L T Martin; K L Mueller; J D Workman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.