Literature DB >> 12095668

Comparing attentional bias to smoking cues in current smokers, former smokers, and non-smokers using a dot-probe task.

Ronald N Ehrman1, Steven J Robbins, Melissa A Bromwell, Megan E Lankford, John R Monterosso, Charles P O'Brien.   

Abstract

Much evidence documents that individuals with emotional and drug-use disorders demonstrate biased attention toward stimuli associated with their disorder. This bias appears to diminish following successful treatment. Two studies examined whether current cigarette smokers show biased attention toward smoking-related images compared with non-smokers (Studies 1 and 2) and whether this bias is less pronounced in former smokers (Study 2). Attentional bias toward cigarette-related photographs was examined using the dot-probe task. Pairs of images (one smoking-related) appeared side by side for 500 ms on a computer screen prior to the presentation of a probe (an asterisk) replacing one of the photographs. Subjects struck a key as quickly as possible to indicate the probe location. Attentional bias was defined as faster reaction times when the probe replaced the smoking-related image. In both studies, current smokers displayed significantly greater attentional bias toward cigarette stimuli than did non-smokers. Former smokers in Study 2 displayed an intermediate level of bias, but did not differ significantly in bias score from either of the other groups. These results support further use of the dot-probe task as a measure of attentional bias in non-abstinent smokers and in individuals undergoing smoking cessation treatment.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12095668     DOI: 10.1016/s0376-8716(02)00065-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend        ISSN: 0376-8716            Impact factor:   4.492


  77 in total

1.  Eye movements to smoking-related cues: effects of nicotine deprivation.

Authors:  Matt Field; Karin Mogg; Brendan P Bradley
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-12-09       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Attentional biases for alcohol cues in heavy and light social drinkers: the roles of initial orienting and maintained attention.

Authors:  Matt Field; Karin Mogg; Jessica Zetteler; Brendan P Bradley
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2004-04-08       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  The resistance to change of observing.

Authors:  Timothy A Shahan; Adam Magee; Andria Dobberstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Behavioural approach tendencies to heroin-related stimuli in abstinent heroin abusers.

Authors:  Yanyan Zhou; Xinyu Li; Meng Zhang; Feng Zhang; Chen Zhu; Mowei Shen
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  An early attentional bias to BEGIN-stimuli of the smoking ritual is accompanied with mesocorticolimbic deactivations in smokers.

Authors:  Bastian Stippekohl; Bertram Walter; Markus H Winkler; Ronald F Mucha; Paul Pauli; Dieter Vaitl; Rudolf Stark
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Attentional and approach biases for smoking cues in smokers: an investigation of competing theoretical views of addiction.

Authors:  Karin Mogg; Matt Field; Brendan P Bradley
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-02-05       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Experimental manipulation of attentional bias increases the motivation to drink alcohol.

Authors:  Matt Field; Brian Eastwood
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Attentional bias for caffeine-related stimuli in high but not moderate or non-caffeine consumers.

Authors:  Martin R Yeomans; Shabnam Javaherian; Heather M Tovey; Lorenzo D Stafford
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Attentional bias affects change detection.

Authors:  Richard H Yaxley; Rolf A Zwaan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-12

10.  Separate and combined impact of acute naltrexone and alprazolam on subjective and physiological effects of oral d-amphetamine in stimulant users.

Authors:  Katherine R Marks; Joshua A Lile; William W Stoops; Craig R Rush
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-01-25       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.