Literature DB >> 24773053

The potential influence of stimulus overselectivity in AAC: information from eye tracking and behavioral studies of attention with individuals with intellectual disabilities.

William V Dube1, Krista M Wilkinson.   

Abstract

This paper examines the phenomenon of stimulus overselectivity, or overselective attention, as it may impact AAC training and use in individuals with intellectual disabilities. Stimulus overselectivity is defined as an atypical limitation in the number of stimuli or stimulus features within an image that are attended to and subsequently learned. Within AAC, the term stimulus could refer to symbols or line drawings on speech-generating devices, drawings or pictures on low-technology systems, and/or the elements within visual scene displays. In this context, overselective attention may result in unusual or uneven error patterns such as confusion between two symbols that share a single feature, or difficulties with transitioning between different types of hardware. We review some of the ways that overselective attention has been studied behaviorally. We then examine how eye tracking technology allows a glimpse into some of the behavioral characteristics of overselective attention. We describe an intervention approach, differential observing responses, that may reduce or eliminate overselectivity, and we consider this type of intervention as it relates to issues of relevance for AAC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AAC; Eye tracking; Intellectual disability; Overselective attention; Overselectivity

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24773053      PMCID: PMC4047139          DOI: 10.3109/07434618.2014.904924

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Augment Altern Commun        ISSN: 0743-4618            Impact factor:   2.214


  36 in total

1.  Matching-to-sample assessment of stimulus overselectivity in students with intellectual disabilities.

Authors:  Chata A Dickson; Curtis K Deutsch; Sharon S Wang; William V Dube
Journal:  Am J Ment Retard       Date:  2006-11

Review 2.  Spontaneity of communication in individuals with autism.

Authors:  Hsu-Min Chiang; Mark Carter
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2007-08-08

3.  Use of a differential observing response to expand restricted stimulus control.

Authors:  Carrie Wallace Walpole; Eileen M Roscoe; William V Dube
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2007

4.  Teaching autistic children to use extra-stimulus prompts.

Authors:  L Schreibman; M H Charlop; R L Koegel
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  1982-06

5.  Re-designing scanning to reduce learning demands: the performance of typically developing 2-year-olds.

Authors:  John McCarthy; Janice Light; Kathryn Drager; David McNaughton; Laura Grodzicki; Jonathan Jones; Elizabeth Panek; Elizabeth Parkin
Journal:  Augment Altern Commun       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.214

6.  Teaching a young child with autism to request assistance conditionally: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Joe Reichle; Patricia L Dropik; Elizabeth Alden-Anderson; Tom Haley
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.408

7.  Embedding an identity-matching task within a prompting hierarchy to facilitate acquisition of conditional discriminations in children with autism.

Authors:  Wayne W Fisher; Tiffany Kodak; James W Moore
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2007

8.  The role of color cues in facilitating accurate and rapid location of aided symbols by children with and without down syndrome.

Authors:  Krista Wilkinson; Michael Carlin; Jennifer Thistle
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.408

9.  Further considerations of visual cognitive neuroscience in aided AAC: the potential role of motion perception systems in maximizing design display.

Authors:  Vinoth Jagaroo; Krista Wilkinson
Journal:  Augment Altern Commun       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.214

Review 10.  Increasing independence in autism spectrum disorders: a review of three focused interventions.

Authors:  Kara Hume; Rachel Loftin; Johanna Lantz
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2009-05-09
View more
  6 in total

1.  Eye tracking research to answer questions about augmentative and alternative communication assessment and intervention.

Authors:  Krista M Wilkinson; Teresa Mitchell
Journal:  Augment Altern Commun       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 2.214

2.  Eye Tracking Measures Reveal How Changes in the Design of Displays for Augmentative and Alternative Communication Influence Visual Search in Individuals With Down Syndrome or Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  Krista M Wilkinson; Marissa Madel
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2019-08-10       Impact factor: 2.408

3.  Reducing overselective stimulus control with differential observing responses.

Authors:  Rachel S Farber; Chata A Dickson; William V Dube
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2016-11-11

4.  Judicious Arrangement of Symbols on a Simulated Augmentative and Alternative Communication Display Optimizes Visual Attention by Individuals With Down Syndrome.

Authors:  Krista M Wilkinson; Rick Gilmore; Yiming Qian
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 2.674

5.  Stimulus Overselectivity in Autism, Down Syndrome, and Typical Development.

Authors:  William V Dube; Rachel S Farber; Marlana R Mueller; Eileen Grant; Lucy Lorin; Curtis K Deutsch
Journal:  Am J Intellect Dev Disabil       Date:  2016-05

6.  Eye-Tracking in Infants and Young Children at Risk for Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review of Visual Stimuli in Experimental Paradigms.

Authors:  Ann M Mastergeorge; Chanaka Kahathuduwa; Jessica Blume
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2021-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.