Literature DB >> 16811752

Response strength in multiple schedules.

J A Nevin.   

Abstract

In several different experiments, pigeons were trained with one schedule or condition of food reinforcement for pecking in the presence of one key color, and a different schedule or condition in the presence of a second key color. After responding in both of these multiple schedule components stabilized, response-independent food was presented during dark-key periods between components, and the rates of pecking in both schedule components decreased. The decrease in responding relative to baseline depended on the frequency, magnitude, delay, or response-rate contingencies of reinforcement prevailing in that component. When reinforcement was terminated, decreases in responding relative to baseline rates were ordered in the same way as with response-independent food. The relations between component response rates were power functions. Internal consistencies in the data, in conjunction with parallel findings in the literature, suggest that the concept of response strength summarizes the effects of diverse procedures, where response strength is identified with relative resistance to change. The exponent of the power function relating response rates may provide the basis for scaling response strength.

Year:  1974        PMID: 16811752      PMCID: PMC1333212          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1974.21-389

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  27 in total

1.  Toward a quantitative theory of secondary reinforcement.

Authors:  L B WYCKOFF
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1959-01       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Resistance-to-extinction functions in the single organism.

Authors:  E HEARST
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-04       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Periodic reinforcement interval and number of periodic reinforcements as parameters of response strength.

Authors:  M P WILSON
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1954-02

4.  Concurrent performances: stimulus-control gradients during schedules of signalled and unsignalled concurrent reinforcement.

Authors:  A C Catania; P J Silverman; D A Stubbs
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Conditioned suppression or facilitation as a function of the behavioral baseline.

Authors:  D Blackman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Stimulus intensity dynamism and auditory generalization for approach and auditory generalization for approach and avoidance behavior in rats.

Authors:  E Hearst
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1969-05

7.  Behavioral contrast and the peak shift: effects of extended discrimination training.

Authors:  H S Terrace
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Effects of reinforcement magnitude on choice and rate of responding.

Authors:  A J Neuringer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  An analysis of contrast effects in multiple schedules.

Authors:  J A Nevin; S J Shettleworth
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-07       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Response rate, reinforcement frequency, and conditioned suppression.

Authors:  D Blackman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  124 in total

1.  Designing interventions that include delayed reinforcement: implications of recent laboratory research.

Authors:  R Stromer; J J McComas; R A Rehfeldt
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2000

2.  Variable-ratio versus variable-interval schedules: response rate, resistance to change, and preference.

Authors:  J A Nevin; S Holland; A P McLean
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Resistance to change of operant variation and repetition.

Authors:  A H Doughty; K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Preference and resistance to change in concurrent variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  Matthew C Bell; Ben A Williams
Journal:  Anim Learn Behav       Date:  2002-02

5.  Preference and resistance to change with constant-duration schedule components.

Authors:  J A Nevin; R C Grace
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 6.  Operant conditioning.

Authors:  J E R Staddon; D T Cerutti
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2002-06-10       Impact factor: 24.137

7.  Use of the high-probability instructional sequence and escape extinction in a child with food refusal.

Authors:  Jennifer E Dawson; Cathleen C Piazza; Bart M Sevin; Charles S Gulotta; Dorothea Lerman; Mary Lou Kelley
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2003

8.  Stimulus generalization of behavioral history.

Authors:  Hiroto Okouchi
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Accuracy of discrimination, rate of responding, and resistance to change.

Authors:  John A Nevin; Jessica Milo; Amy L Odum; Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  From molecular to molar: a paradigm shift in behavior analysis.

Authors:  William M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.