Literature DB >> 11720336

Evaluation of a flat CRT monitor for use in radiology.

H Roehrig1, E A Krupinski, T Furukawa.   

Abstract

Medical radiographs based on familiar projection techniques are planar images traditionally displayed by placing on a flat surface viewbox. Presenting these planar images in digital form on a traditional monitor with a curved surface may cause distortions, possibly affecting diagnoses. This would be true especially if physical linear dimensions of the anatomy are important. Reflections from ambient lights behind the observer also could be a problem with curved displays. The goal of this study was to compare physical and psychophysical performance of a flat-surface display monitor with a traditional curved-surface monitor. Two display monitors with different types of front glass-panel surfaces were evaluated. The first monitor had a traditional curved surface, and the other had a flat surface. Physical measurements included dynamic range, display function, veiling glare, and spatial uniformity. An observer performance study used low-contrast, square-wave patterns to determine just-noticeable differences. Ambient lights were turned off in one condition and on in the other. Physical measurements showed that the display functions were nearly identical, but uniformity, veiling glare, and signal-to-noise-ratio were better for the curved monitor. Observer performance was better overall with the curved monitor, but the degradation in performance between lights off and lights on was greater for the curved than flat monitor. The greater degradation with the lights on could be attributed to more reflections off the curved than the flat monitor. A flat-surface display monitor may be useful for viewing clinical radiographs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11720336      PMCID: PMC3607471          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-001-0013-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  5 in total

1.  Effect of room illuminance on monitor black level luminance and monitor calibration.

Authors:  K Chakrabarti; R V Kaczmarek; J A Thomas; A Romanyukha
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2004-01-30       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Diagnostic performance of liquid crystal and cathode-ray-tube monitors in brain computed tomography.

Authors:  Gerald Pärtan; Rudolf Mayrhofer; Michael Urban; Manfred Wassipaul; Ludwig Pichler; Walter Hruby
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-02-19       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Comparison of liquid crystal versus cathode ray tube display for the detection of simulated chest lesions.

Authors:  Elisabeth Oschatz; Mathias Prokop; Martina Scharitzer; Michael Weber; Csilla Balassy; Cornelia Schaefer-Prokop
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-09-08       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Development of a randomised contrast detail digital phantom for observer detectability study.

Authors:  Ms Nizam; Kh Ng; Bjj Abdullah
Journal:  Biomed Imaging Interv J       Date:  2006-07-01

5.  ACR-AAPM-SIIM practice guideline for determinants of image quality in digital mammography.

Authors:  Kalpana M Kanal; Elizabeth Krupinski; Eric A Berns; William R Geiser; Andrew Karellas; Martha B Mainiero; Melissa C Martin; Samir B Patel; Daniel L Rubin; Jon D Shepard; Eliot L Siegel; Judith A Wolfman; Tariq A Mian; Mary C Mahoney
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.056

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.