Literature DB >> 10847389

Contrast-detail characteristic evaluations of several display devices.

J Wang1, J Anderson, T Lane, C Stetson, J Moore.   

Abstract

The contrast-detail characteristic of a display system is a powerful tool for evaluating displayed image quality. It takes into account the physical properties of the display, the psychophysical aspects of the observer, and the viewing conditions. It is a more sensitive measurement of the displayed image quality than a simple Society of Motion Picture and Television (SMPTE) pattern. Yet, it is relatively simple to measure and requires no special equipment or analysis tools. In this presentation, the results of the evaluation of several cathode ray tube (CRT) monitors and a digital projector will be presented. Contrast-detail characteristics of these display devices were measured under various gamma and display settings. The results show excellent intraobserver and interobserver variance (<1 step on the grayscale). Extraneous light, such as room lighting, affects the contrast threshold more severely at low background levels more than at high background. Gamma settings on graphics adapters affect the shapes of the contrast-detail curve for all display types. Gamma settings of approximately 2.0 result in a better contrast threshold for both high and low background brightness. The results show complex differences in contrast-detail characteristics for different display types. The digital projector display not only has significantly worse performance than CRT monitors, but also is affected more by extraneous light. High-brightness monitors with optimal monitor and graphics adapter settings have better performance than color or low-brightness monitors. However, under some settings, the performance of high-brightness monitors is not always better at all object sizes and background levels.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10847389      PMCID: PMC3453272          DOI: 10.1007/bf03167651

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  6 in total

1.  Effect of display luminance on the feature detection rates of masses in mammograms.

Authors:  B M Hemminger; A W Dillon; R E Johnston; K E Muller; M C Deluca; C S Coffey; E D Pisano
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Characterization of monochrome CRT display systems in the field.

Authors:  H Roehrig; C E Willis; M A Damento
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Characterization of color CRT display systems for monochrome applications.

Authors:  G Spekowius
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Quantitative evaluation of overall electronic display quality.

Authors:  N J Hangiandreou; K A Fetterly; S N Bernatz; L J Cesar; D S Groth; J P Felmlee
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 5.  A brief review of human perception factors in digital displays for picture archiving and communications systems.

Authors:  J Wang; S Langer
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Image presentation in digital radiology: perspectives on the emerging DICOM display function standard and its application.

Authors:  H Blume; B M Hemminger
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.333

  6 in total
  8 in total

1.  Effect of room illuminance on monitor black level luminance and monitor calibration.

Authors:  K Chakrabarti; R V Kaczmarek; J A Thomas; A Romanyukha
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2004-01-30       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Proposal of a quality-index or metric for soft copy display systems: contrast sensitivity study.

Authors:  Jihong Wang; Ken Compton; Qi Peng
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2003-09-11       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  A perceptual evaluation of JPEG 2000 image compression for digital mammography: contrast-detail characteristics.

Authors:  Sankararaman Suryanarayanan; Andrew Karellas; Srinivasan Vedantham; Sandra M Waldrop; Carl J D'Orsi
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Development and evaluation of a new gray-scale test pattern to adjust gradients of thoracic CT imaging.

Authors:  M Yamaguchi; H Fujita; M Uemura; Y Asai; H Wakae; M Ishifuro
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-04-02       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Assessment of PACS display systems.

Authors:  John E Aldrich; John D Rutledge
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Detection of simulated microcalcifications in a phantom with digital mammography: effect of pixel size.

Authors:  Sankararaman Suryanarayanan; Andrew Karellas; Srinivasan Vedantham; Ioannis Sechopoulos; Carl J D'Orsi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  LCD and CRT display of storage phosphor plate and limited cone beam computed tomography images for the evaluation of root canal fillings.

Authors:  B Güniz Baksi; Elif Soğur; Hans-Göran Gröndahl
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Contrast sensitivity of digital imaging display systems: contrast threshold dependency on object type and implications for monitor quality assurance and quality control in PACS.

Authors:  Jihong Wang; Jun Xu; Veera Baladandayuthapani
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.071

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.