Literature DB >> 21614246

Development of a randomised contrast detail digital phantom for observer detectability study.

Ms Nizam1, Kh Ng, Bjj Abdullah.   

Abstract

The accuracy and the efficacy of radiological diagnosis depend, to a large extent, on the conditions under which radiographs and images are viewed. This mainly involves the luminance of the display devices and the ambient room illumination. We report a perceptual study to investigate the relationship between detectability and monitor luminance as well as ambient illuminance. A statistical test pattern was used in this study, and the test pattern was developed using Microsoft® Visual Basic 6. The test pattern contained a set of randomised contrast detail objects, that is, disks of different diameters (0.7, 1.0, 1.4, and 2.0 mm) and contrasts against a black background (2.7, 3.9, 5.5, and 7.8%), simulating lesions in digital images. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used in this study. The results indicated that a set of optimal viewing conditions exists and that it has a significant effect on detectability performance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Image quality; contrast detail; perception; receiver operating characteristics

Year:  2006        PMID: 21614246      PMCID: PMC3097632          DOI: 10.2349/biij.2.3.e38

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Imaging Interv J        ISSN: 1823-5530


  11 in total

1.  Effect of display luminance on the feature detection rates of masses in mammograms.

Authors:  B M Hemminger; A W Dillon; R E Johnston; K E Muller; M C Deluca; C S Coffey; E D Pisano
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  The Rose model, revisited.

Authors:  A E Burgess
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.129

3.  Evaluation of a flat CRT monitor for use in radiology.

Authors:  H Roehrig; E A Krupinski; T Furukawa
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Image quality degradation by light scattering in display devices.

Authors:  M J Flynn; A Badano
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Effect of room illuminance on monitor black level luminance and monitor calibration.

Authors:  K Chakrabarti; R V Kaczmarek; J A Thomas; A Romanyukha
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2004-01-30       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  An interactive method of assessing the characteristics of softcopy display using observer performance tests.

Authors:  Jihong Wang; Qi Peng
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2002-03-19       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Application of StatPhantom software for image quality evaluation.

Authors:  George Davydenko; Victor Gurvich; Mark Smekhov
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2002-03-21       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  A clinical evaluation of the image quality computer program, CoCIQ.

Authors:  E Norrman; M Gårdestig; J Persliden; H Geijer
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 9.  A brief review of human perception factors in digital displays for picture archiving and communications systems.

Authors:  J Wang; S Langer
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.056

10.  Quality control of cathode-ray tube monitors for medical imaging using a simple photometer.

Authors:  D M Parsons; Y Kim; D R Haynor
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.056

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.