Literature DB >> 16437286

Optimization of reading conditions for flat panel displays.

J A Thomas1, K Chakrabarti, R V Kaczmarek, A Maslennikov, C A Mitchell, A Romanyukha.   

Abstract

Task Group 18 (TG 18) of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine has developed guidelines for Assessment of Display Performance for Medical Imaging Systems. In this document, a method for determination of the maximum room lighting for displays is suggested. It is based on luminance measurements of a black target displayed on each display device at different room illuminance levels. Linear extrapolation of the above luminance measurements vs. room illuminance allows one to determine diffuse and specular reflection coefficients. TG 18 guidelines have established recommended maximum room lighting. It is based on the characterization of the display by its minimum and maximum luminance and the description of room by diffuse and specular coefficients. We carried out these luminance measurements for three selected displays to determine their optimum viewing conditions: one cathode ray tube and two flat panels. We found some problems with the application of the TG 18 guidelines to optimize viewing conditions for IBM T221 flat panels. Introduction of the requirement for minimum room illuminance allows a more accurate determination of the optimal viewing conditions (maximum and minimum room illuminance) for IBM flat panels. It also addresses the possible loss of contrast in medical images on flat panel displays because of the effect of nonlinearity in the dependence of luminance on room illuminance at low room lighting.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16437286      PMCID: PMC3045187          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-006-9710-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  7 in total

1.  Effect of room illuminance on monitor black level luminance and monitor calibration.

Authors:  K Chakrabarti; R V Kaczmarek; J A Thomas; A Romanyukha
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2004-01-30       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Diagnostic performance of liquid crystal and cathode-ray-tube monitors in brain computed tomography.

Authors:  Gerald Pärtan; Rudolf Mayrhofer; Michael Urban; Manfred Wassipaul; Ludwig Pichler; Walter Hruby
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-02-19       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Assessment of flat panel LCD primary class display performance based on AAPM TG 18 acceptance protocol.

Authors:  Haijo Jung; Hee-Joung Kim; Won-Suk Kang; Sun Kook Yoo; Kiyoto Fujioka; Mikio Hasegawa; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Flat-panel display (LCD) versus high-resolution gray-scale display (CRT) for chest radiography: an observer preference study.

Authors:  Csilla Balassy; Mathias Prokop; Michael Weber; Johannes Sailer; Christian J Herold; Cornelia Schaefer-Prokop
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Evaluation of and compensation for spatial noise of LCDs in medical applications.

Authors:  Jiahua Fan; Hans Roehrig; Malur K Sundareshan; Elizabeth Krupinski; William J Dallas; Kunal Gandhi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Use of a human visual system model to predict observer performance with CRT vs LCD display of images.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Krupinski; Jeffrey Johnson; Hans Roehrig; John Nafziger; Jiahua Fan; Jeffery Lubin
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Detectability of catheters on bedside chest radiographs: comparison between liquid crystal display and high-resolution cathode-ray tube monitors.

Authors:  Martina Scharitzer; Mathias Prokop; Michael Weber; Michael Fuchsjäger; Elisabeth Oschatz; Cornelia Schaefer-Prokop
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 11.105

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.