Literature DB >> 19365691

Quantifying envelope and fine-structure coding in auditory nerve responses to chimaeric speech.

Michael G Heinz1, Jayaganesh Swaminathan.   

Abstract

Any sound can be separated mathematically into a slowly varying envelope and rapidly varying fine-structure component. This property has motivated numerous perceptual studies to understand the relative importance of each component for speech and music perception. Specialized acoustic stimuli, such as auditory chimaeras with the envelope of one sound and fine structure of another have been used to separate the perceptual roles for envelope and fine structure. Cochlear narrowband filtering limits the ability to isolate fine structure from envelope; however, envelope recovery from fine structure has been difficult to evaluate physiologically. To evaluate envelope recovery at the output of the cochlea, neural cross-correlation coefficients were developed that quantify the similarity between two sets of spike-train responses. Shuffled auto- and cross-correlogram analyses were used to compute separate correlations for responses to envelope and fine structure based on both model and recorded spike trains from auditory nerve fibers. Previous correlogram analyses were extended to isolate envelope coding more effectively in auditory nerve fibers with low center frequencies, which are particularly important for speech coding. Recovered speech envelopes were present in both model and recorded responses to one- and 16-band speech fine-structure chimaeras and were significantly greater for the one-band case, consistent with perceptual studies. Model predictions suggest that cochlear recovered envelopes are reduced following sensorineural hearing loss due to broadened tuning associated with outer-hair cell dysfunction. In addition to the within-fiber cross-stimulus cases considered here, these neural cross-correlation coefficients can also be used to evaluate spatiotemporal coding by applying them to cross-fiber within-stimulus conditions. Thus, these neural metrics can be used to quantitatively evaluate a wide range of perceptually significant temporal coding issues relevant to normal and impaired hearing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19365691      PMCID: PMC3084379          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-009-0169-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  70 in total

1.  Intrinsic envelope fluctuations and modulation-detection thresholds for narrow-band noise carriers.

Authors:  T Dau; J Verhey; A Kohlrausch
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Odour-plume dynamics influence the brain's olfactory code.

Authors:  N J Vickers; T A Christensen; T C Baker; J G Hildebrand
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-03-22       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  A phenomenological model for the responses of auditory-nerve fibers: I. Nonlinear tuning with compression and suppression.

Authors:  X Zhang; M G Heinz; I C Bruce; L H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  An auditory-periphery model of the effects of acoustic trauma on auditory nerve responses.

Authors:  Ian C Bruce; Murray B Sachs; Eric D Young
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Threshold tuning curves of chinchilla auditory nerve fibers. II. Dependence on spontaneous activity and relation to cochlear nonlinearity.

Authors:  Andrei N Temchin; Nola C Rich; Mario A Ruggero
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Otoacoustic estimation of cochlear tuning: validation in the chinchilla.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; John J Guinan; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-05-04

7.  Auditory nerve fiber responses to electric stimulation: modulated and unmodulated pulse trains.

Authors:  L Litvak; B Delgutte; D Eddington
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Abnormal processing of temporal fine structure in speech for frequencies where absolute thresholds are normal.

Authors:  Christian Lorenzi; Louis Debruille; Stéphane Garnier; Pierre Fleuriot; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Threshold tuning curves of chinchilla auditory-nerve fibers. I. Dependence on characteristic frequency and relation to the magnitudes of cochlear vibrations.

Authors:  Andrei N Temchin; Nola C Rich; Mario A Ruggero
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 10.  The role of temporal fine structure processing in pitch perception, masking, and speech perception for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired people.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-10-15
View more
  41 in total

1.  Comparing the effects of reverberation and of noise on speech recognition in simulated electric-acoustic listening.

Authors:  Kate Helms Tillery; Christopher A Brown; Sid P Bacon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Psychophysiological analyses demonstrate the importance of neural envelope coding for speech perception in noise.

Authors:  Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Relative contributions of temporal envelope and fine structure cues to lexical tone recognition in hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Shuo Wang; Li Xu; Robert Mannell
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-08-11

4.  Implications of within-fiber temporal coding for perceptual studies of F0 discrimination and discrimination of harmonic and inharmonic tone complexes.

Authors:  Sushrut Kale; Christophe Micheyl; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-06

5.  Role and relative contribution of temporal envelope and fine structure cues in sentence recognition by normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Sarah E Yoho; Carla L Youngdahl; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The ability of cochlear implant users to use temporal envelope cues recovered from speech frequency modulation.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Christian Lorenzi; Kaibao Nie; Xing Li; Elyse M Jameyson; Ward R Drennan; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Predicted effects of sensorineural hearing loss on across-fiber envelope coding in the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  On the mechanisms involved in the recovery of envelope information from temporal fine structure.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Rebecca E Millman; Neal F Viemeister; Christopher A Brown; Sid P Bacon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  The role of recovered envelope cues in the identification of temporal-fine-structure speech for hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Agnès C Léger; Joseph G Desloge; Louis D Braida; Jayaganesh Swaminathan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Predictions of Speech Chimaera Intelligibility Using Auditory Nerve Mean-Rate and Spike-Timing Neural Cues.

Authors:  Michael R Wirtzfeld; Rasha A Ibrahim; Ian C Bruce
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-07-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.