Literature DB >> 12141350

Features of stimulation affecting tonal-speech perception: implications for cochlear prostheses.

Li Xu1, Yuhjung Tsai, Bryan E Pfingst.   

Abstract

Tone languages differ from English in that the pitch pattern of a single-syllable word conveys lexical meaning. In the present study, dependence of tonal-speech perception on features of the stimulation was examined using an acoustic simulation of a CIS-type speech-processing strategy for cochlear prostheses. Contributions of spectral features of the speech signals were assessed by varying the number of filter bands, while contributions of temporal envelope features were assessed by varying the low-pass cutoff frequency used for extracting the amplitude envelopes. Ten normal-hearing native Mandarin Chinese speakers were tested. When the low-pass cutoff frequency was fixed at 512 Hz, consonant, vowel, and sentence recognition improved as a function of the number of channels and reached plateau at 4 to 6 channels. Subjective judgments of sound quality continued to improve as the number of channels increased to 12, the highest number tested. Tone recognition, i.e., recognition of the four Mandarin tone patterns, depended on both the number of channels and the low-pass cutoff frequency. The trade-off between the temporal and spectral cues for tone recognition indicates that temporal cues can compensate for diminished spectral cues for tone recognition and vice versa. An additional tone recognition experiment using syllables of equal duration showed a marked decrease in performance, indicating that duration cues contribute to tone recognition. A third experiment showed that recognition of processed FM patterns that mimic Mandarin tone patterns was poor when temporal envelope and duration cues were removed.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12141350      PMCID: PMC1414789          DOI: 10.1121/1.1487843

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  34 in total

1.  Coding of the fundamental frequency in continuous interleaved sampling processors for cochlear implants.

Authors:  L Geurts; J Wouters
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.

Authors:  L M Friesen; R V Shannon; D Baskent; X Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  A cochlear frequency-position function for several species--29 years later.

Authors:  D D Greenwood
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  [Staggered spondaic word test and the competing sentence test].

Authors:  R Gu
Journal:  Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi       Date:  1988

5.  Speech waveform envelope cues for consonant recognition.

Authors:  D J Van Tasell; S D Soli; V M Kirby; G P Widin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Effects of electrode configuration and place of stimulation on speech perception with cochlear prostheses.

Authors:  B E Pfingst; K H Franck; L Xu; E M Bauer; T A Zwolan
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2001-06

7.  A "rationalized" arcsine transform.

Authors:  G A Studebaker
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1985-09

8.  Speech-discrimination scores modeled as a binomial variable.

Authors:  A R Thornton; M J Raffin
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1978-09

9.  Chinese tonal language rehabilitation following cochlear implantation in children.

Authors:  W I Wei; R Wong; Y Hui; D K Au; B Y Wong; W K Ho; A Tsang; P Kung; E Chung
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.494

10.  Effects of the salience of pitch and periodicity information on the intelligibility of four-channel vocoded speech: implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  A Faulkner; S Rosen; C Smith
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  55 in total

1.  Across-site variation in detection thresholds and maximum comfortable loudness levels for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Bryan E Pfingst; Li Xu
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-11-20

2.  Relative importance of temporal envelope and fine structure in lexical-tone perception.

Authors:  Li Xu; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  Probing the electrode-neuron interface with focused cochlear implant stimulation.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-06

4.  Relative contributions of temporal envelope and fine structure cues to lexical tone recognition in hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Shuo Wang; Li Xu; Robert Mannell
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-08-11

5.  Effects of stimulation rate, mode and level on modulation detection by cochlear implant users.

Authors:  John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-09

6.  Relative contributions of spectral and temporal cues for phoneme recognition.

Authors:  Li Xu; Catherine S Thompson; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Fundamental frequency discrimination and speech perception in noise in cochlear implant simulations.

Authors:  Jeff Carroll; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Speech recognition and temporal amplitude modulation processing by Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Qian-Jie Fu; Chao-Gang Wei; Ke-Li Cao
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Lexical tone recognition in noise in normal-hearing children and prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Yitao Mao; Li Xu
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 2.117

Review 10.  Trends in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2004
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.