Literature DB >> 18646999

Speech identification based on temporal fine structure cues.

Stanley Sheft1, Marine Ardoint, Christian Lorenzi.   

Abstract

The contribution of temporal fine structure (TFS) cues to consonant identification was assessed in normal-hearing listeners with two speech-processing schemes designed to remove temporal envelope (E) cues. Stimuli were processed vowel-consonant-vowel speech tokens. Derived from the analytic signal, carrier signals were extracted from the output of a bank of analysis filters. The "PM" and "FM" processing schemes estimated a phase- and frequency-modulation function, respectively, of each carrier signal and applied them to a sinusoidal carrier at the analysis-filter center frequency. In the FM scheme, processed signals were further restricted to the analysis-filter bandwidth. A third scheme retaining only E cues from each band was used for comparison. Stimuli processed with the PM and FM schemes were found to be highly intelligible (50-80% correct identification) over a variety of experimental conditions designed to affect the putative reconstruction of E cues subsequent to peripheral auditory filtering. Analysis of confusions between consonants showed that the contribution of TFS cues was greater for place than manner of articulation, whereas the converse was observed for E cues. Taken together, these results indicate that TFS cues convey important phonetic information that is not solely a consequence of E reconstruction.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18646999      PMCID: PMC2809700          DOI: 10.1121/1.2918540

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  34 in total

1.  Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception.

Authors:  Zachary M Smith; Bertrand Delgutte; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-03-07       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Auditory filter bandwidths as a function of level at low frequencies (125 Hz-1 kHz)

Authors:  S Rosen; D Stock
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  On the perception of speech from time-varying acoustic information: contributions of amplitude variation.

Authors:  R Remez; P E Rubin
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-10

4.  Masking release for consonant features in temporally fluctuating background noise.

Authors:  Christian Füllgrabe; Frédéric Berthommier; Christian Lorenzi
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2005-11-08       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Effects of temporal fine structure on the lateralization of speech and on speech understanding in noise.

Authors:  Ward R Drennan; Jong Ho Won; Vasant K Dasika; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-02-27

6.  Frequency-weighting functions for broadband speech as estimated by a correlational method.

Authors:  C W Turner; B J Kwon; C Tanaka; J Knapp; J L Hubbartt; K A Doherty
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Basilar membrane mechanics at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. I. Input-output functions, tuning curves, and response phases.

Authors:  L Robles; M A Ruggero; N C Rich
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues.

Authors:  R V Shannon; F G Zeng; V Kamath; J Wygonski; M Ekelid
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Temporal modulation transfer functions based upon modulation thresholds.

Authors:  N F Viemeister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Quantifying the effects of fast-acting compression on the envelope of speech.

Authors:  Michael A Stone; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  34 in total

1.  Revisiting place and temporal theories of pitch.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Acoust Sci Technol       Date:  2013

2.  Relative contribution of target and masker temporal fine structure to the unmasking of consonants in noise.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Psychophysiological analyses demonstrate the importance of neural envelope coding for speech perception in noise.

Authors:  Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Relative contributions of temporal envelope and fine structure cues to lexical tone recognition in hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Shuo Wang; Li Xu; Robert Mannell
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-08-11

5.  Quantifying envelope and fine-structure coding in auditory nerve responses to chimaeric speech.

Authors:  Michael G Heinz; Jayaganesh Swaminathan
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-04-14

6.  The ability of cochlear implant users to use temporal envelope cues recovered from speech frequency modulation.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Christian Lorenzi; Kaibao Nie; Xing Li; Elyse M Jameyson; Ward R Drennan; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  On the importance of preserving the harmonics and neighboring partials prior to vocoder processing: implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Yi Hu; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Robust Neuronal Discrimination in Primary Auditory Cortex Despite Degradations of Spectro-temporal Acoustic Details: Comparison Between Guinea Pigs with Normal Hearing and Mild Age-Related Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Yonane Aushana; Samira Souffi; Jean-Marc Edeline; Christian Lorenzi; Chloé Huetz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-01-04

9.  Impaired perception of temporal fine structure and musical timbre in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Joseph Heng; Gabriela Cantarero; Mounya Elhilali; Charles J Limb
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Relative salience of envelope and fine structure cues in zebra finch song.

Authors:  Beth A Vernaleo; Robert J Dooling
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.