Literature DB >> 14689227

Non-invasive 16-row multislice CT coronary angiography: usefulness of saline chaser.

Filippo Cademartiri1, Nico Mollet, Aad van der Lugt, Koen Nieman, Peter M T Pattynama, Pim J de Feyter, Gabriel P Krestin.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the usefulness of saline chaser in 16-row multislice CT (16-MSCT) coronary angiography. Forty-two patients were divided into two groups for contrast material (CM) administration: group 1 (140 ml at 4 ml/s) and group 2 (100 ml at 4 ml/s followed by 40 ml of saline chaser at 4 ml/s). All patients underwent retrospectively ECG-gated 16-MSCT coronary angiography. The attenuation at the origin coronary vessels was assessed. Three regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn throughout the data set: (a) ascending aorta (ROI 1); (b) descending aorta (ROI 2); and (c) pulmonary artery (ROI 3). The attenuation in the superior vena cava was recorded (ROI 4). The average attenuation and the slope were calculated in each ROI and differences were assessed with a Student's t test. The average attenuation in the coronary vessels was not significantly different in the two groups. The average attenuations in ROI 1 were 325 and 327 HU, in ROI 2 were 328 and 329 HU and in ROI 3 were 357 and 320 HU, for groups 1 and 2, respectively (p>0.05). The slopes in ROI 1 were -0.2 and 1.1, in ROI 2 were 2.8 and 2.1 (p>0.05) and in ROI 3 were 3.9 and -9.0 (p<0.05), for groups 1 and 2, respectively. The average attenuations in ROI 4 were 927 and 643 HU (p<0.05), for groups 1 and 2, respectively. One hundred milliliters of CM with 40 ml of saline chaser provides the same attenuation as 140 ml of CM (35% less) with decreased hyper-attenuation in the superior vena cava.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14689227     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-003-2188-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  19 in total

1.  Optimization of automatic bolus tracking for timing of the arterial phase of helical liver CT.

Authors:  J J Sandstede; A Tschammler; M Beer; C Vogelsang; G Wittenberg; D Hahn
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Automatic bolus tracking in monophasic spiral CT of the liver: liver-to-lesion conspicuity.

Authors:  F Mehnert; P L Pereira; J Trübenbach; A F Kopp; C D Claussen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Parameters affecting bolus geometry in CTA: a review.

Authors:  Filippo Cademartiri; Aad van der Lugt; Giacomo Luccichenti; Paolo Pavone; Gabriel P Krestin
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.826

4.  Dual-phase helical CT of the liver: effects of bolus tracking and different volumes of contrast material.

Authors:  L Kopka; J Rodenwaldt; U Fischer; D W Mueller; J W Oestmann; E Grabbe
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Reliable noninvasive coronary angiography with fast submillimeter multislice spiral computed tomography.

Authors:  Koen Nieman; Filippo Cademartiri; Pedro A Lemos; Rolf Raaijmakers; Peter M T Pattynama; Pim J de Feyter
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Timing of the hepatic arterial phase during contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the liver: assessment of normal values in 25 volunteers.

Authors:  T R Bader; R W Prokesch; F Grabenwöger
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 6.016

7.  Factors influencing vascular and hepatic enhancement at CT: experimental study on injection protocol using a canine model.

Authors:  J K Han; A Y Kim; K Y Lee; J B Seo; T K Kim; B I Choi; C S Lhee; M C Han
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.826

8.  Using a saline chaser to decrease contrast media in abdominal CT.

Authors:  Paul J Dorio; Fred T Lee; Kevin P Henseler; Mark Pilot; Myron A Pozniak; Thomas C Winter; Sarah A Shock
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Detection of coronary artery stenoses with thin-slice multi-detector row spiral computed tomography and multiplanar reconstruction.

Authors:  Dieter Ropers; Ulrich Baum; Karsten Pohle; Katharina Anders; Stefan Ulzheimer; Bernd Ohnesorge; Christian Schlundt; Werner Bautz; Werner G Daniel; Stephan Achenbach
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-02-11       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  [Visualization of coronary arteries in CT as assessed by a new 16 slice technology and reduced gantry rotation time: first experiences].

Authors:  M Heuschmid; A Küttner; T Flohr; J E Wildberger; M Lell; A F Kopp; S Schröder; U Baum; S Schaller; A Hartung; B Ohnesorge; C D Claussen
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2002-06
View more
  20 in total

1.  Comparison of different volumes of saline flush in the assessment of perivenous artefacts in the subclavian vein during cervical CT angiography.

Authors:  N Takeyama; Y Ohgiya; T Hayashi; T Takahashi; D Takasu; J Nakashima; K Kato; Y Kinebuchi; T Hashimoto; T Gokan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Plaque imaging with CT coronary angiography: Effect of intra-vascular attenuation on plaque type classification.

Authors:  Erica Maffei; Chiara Martini; Teresa Arcadi; Alberto Clemente; Sara Seitun; Alessandra Zuccarelli; Tito Torri; Nico R Mollet; Alexia Rossi; Onofrio Catalano; Giancarlo Messalli; Filippo Cademartiri
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2012-06-28

3.  Multi-detector row CT of the head and neck: comparison of different volumes of contrast material with and without a saline chaser.

Authors:  Dae Young Yoon; Su Yeon You; Chul Soon Choi; Suk Ki Chang; Eun Joo Yun; Young Lan Seo; Sang Joon Park; Yu-Jin Lee; Jeung Hee Moon; Young-Soo Rho; Jin-Hwan Kim
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Visualisation of non-invasive coronary bypass imaging: 4-row vs. 16-row multidetector computed tomography.

Authors:  M Fawad Khan; Christopher Herzog; Kai Landenberger; Adel Maataoui; Sven Martens; Hanns Ackermann; Anton Moritz; Thomas J Vogl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Multislice CT coronary angiography: how to do it and what is the current clinical performance?

Authors:  Filippo Cademartiri; Joanne D Schuijf; Nico R Mollet; Patrizia Malagutti; Giuseppe Runza; Jeroen J Bax; Pim J de Feyter
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Effect of varying injection rates of a saline chaser on aortic enhancement in CT angiography: phantom study.

Authors:  Sebastian T Schindera; Rendon C Nelson; Laurens Howle; Eli Nichols; David M DeLong; Elmar M Merkle
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Contrast agent bolus tracking with a fixed threshold or a manual fast start for coronary CT angiography.

Authors:  Fabian Stenzel; Matthias Rief; Elke Zimmermann; Johannes Greupner; Felicitas Richter; Marc Dewey
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Minimizing individual variations in arterial enhancement on coronary CT angiographs using "contrast enhancement optimizer": a prospective randomized single-center study.

Authors:  Yoriaki Matsumoto; Toru Higaki; Takanori Masuda; Tomoyasu Sato; Yuko Nakamura; Fuminari Tatsugami; Kazuo Awai
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Image quality and attenuation values of multidetector CT coronary angiography using high iodine-concentration contrast material: a comparison of the use of iopromide 370 and iomeprol 400.

Authors:  Eun Young Kim; Dae Wook Yeh; Yeon Hyeon Choe; Won Jae Lee; Hyo Keun Lim
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.990

10.  Quantification of left ventricular function and mass in cardiac Dual-Source CT (DSCT) exams: comparison of manual and semiautomatic segmentation algorithms.

Authors:  Gorka Bastarrika; María Arraiza; Jesús C Pueyo; María J Herraiz; Beatriz Zudaire; Alberto Villanueva
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.