INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of different volumes of contrast material with and without a saline chaser on tissue enhancement in multidetector row CT (MDCT) of the head and neck. METHODS: In a blind prospective fashion, 120 patients were randomized into the following four groups: group 1, 80 ml contrast material administered at a flow rate of 2.0 ml/s; group 2, 80 ml followed by 40 ml saline at 2.0 ml/s; group 3, 60 ml at 1.5 ml/s; and group 4, 60 ml followed by 30 ml saline at 1.5 ml/s. The attenuation values of the carotid artery, internal jugular vein, and muscle were measured at an interval of 1.5 s in each patient. The degree of perivenous artifacts was subjectively assessed. RESULTS:Mean attenuation values in the carotid artery and internal jugular vein were significantly higher in groups 1 and 2 than in groups 3 and 4. The width of the diagnostic window (both carotid and jugular enhancement >150 HU) were significantly longer in groups 1 and 2 than in groups 3 and 4. The addition of a saline chaser did not result in improved vascular enhancement or a wider diagnostic window, but reduced perivenous artifacts, compared with using contrast material alone. CONCLUSION: Reduction of contrast material from 80 to 60 ml results in insufficient enhancement of neck vessels. In addition, the benefit of a saline chaser technique is not obvious except for its ability to reduce perivenous artifacts.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of different volumes of contrast material with and without a saline chaser on tissue enhancement in multidetector row CT (MDCT) of the head and neck. METHODS: In a blind prospective fashion, 120 patients were randomized into the following four groups: group 1, 80 ml contrast material administered at a flow rate of 2.0 ml/s; group 2, 80 ml followed by 40 ml saline at 2.0 ml/s; group 3, 60 ml at 1.5 ml/s; and group 4, 60 ml followed by 30 ml saline at 1.5 ml/s. The attenuation values of the carotid artery, internal jugular vein, and muscle were measured at an interval of 1.5 s in each patient. The degree of perivenous artifacts was subjectively assessed. RESULTS: Mean attenuation values in the carotid artery and internal jugular vein were significantly higher in groups 1 and 2 than in groups 3 and 4. The width of the diagnostic window (both carotid and jugular enhancement >150 HU) were significantly longer in groups 1 and 2 than in groups 3 and 4. The addition of a saline chaser did not result in improved vascular enhancement or a wider diagnostic window, but reduced perivenous artifacts, compared with using contrast material alone. CONCLUSION: Reduction of contrast material from 80 to 60 ml results in insufficient enhancement of neck vessels. In addition, the benefit of a saline chaser technique is not obvious except for its ability to reduce perivenous artifacts.
Authors: Helmut Schoellnast; Manfred Tillich; Michael J Deutschmann; Hannes A Deutschmann; Gottfried J Schaffler; Horst R Portugaller Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Filippo Cademartiri; Aad van der Lugt; Giacomo Luccichenti; Paolo Pavone; Gabriel P Krestin Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 2002 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 1.826
Authors: Paul J Dorio; Fred T Lee; Kevin P Henseler; Mark Pilot; Myron A Pozniak; Thomas C Winter; Sarah A Shock Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: N Takeyama; Y Ohgiya; T Hayashi; T Takahashi; D Takasu; J Nakashima; K Kato; Y Kinebuchi; T Hashimoto; T Gokan Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2010-11-02 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: J Weber; P Veith; B Jung; G Ihorst; O Moske-Eick; S Meckel; H Urbach; C A Taschner Journal: Clin Neuroradiol Date: 2014-01-03 Impact factor: 3.649
Authors: Georg Mühlenbruch; Marco Das; Gottfried Mommertz; Meike Schaaf; Stefan Langer; Andreas Horst Mahnken; Joachim Ernst Wildberger; A Thron; Rolf W Günther; Timo Krings Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2009-08-21 Impact factor: 5.315