OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine attenuation values in the central vein and perivenous artefacts at the subclavian vein in cervical CT angiography (CTA) when using 40 ml contrast material (CM) followed by different volumes (25 ml vs 40 ml) of saline flush (SF). METHODS: 61 patients underwent CTA between the aortic arch (AA) and distal to the circle of Willis (cW). After calculating test-bolus time to peak enhancement at the cW (Tc), scanning delay was represented as [(Tc + 4) - scan duration between AA and cW] s. 28 patients (Group A) received 40 ml of 370 mg iodine (I) ml(-1) CM followed by 25 ml of SF, and 33 patients (Group B) received the same CM followed by 40 ml of SF, both administered through the right antecubital vein. Arterial attenuation was measured at seven points in the aorto-carotid artery and at three points in the vertebrobasilar artery. Venous attenuation in the central vein was measured at four points. Mean attenuation values were analysed quantitatively. Axial and post-processing three-dimensional images were assessed qualitatively. RESULTS: When Groups A and B were compared, there were no differences in the mean attenuation values in either the aorto-carotid artery (p=0.78) or the vertebrobasilar artery (p=0.82). Mean venous attenuation values were lower (p=0.002) in Group B than in Group A. Although the qualitative assessment of arterial images showed no differences between the two groups overall, perivenous artefacts at the subclavian vein were assessed as less prominent (p<0.01) in Group B. CONCLUSIONS: When compared with CTA followed by 25 ml of SF, CTA followed by 40 ml of SF can reduce venous attenuation values and perivenous artefacts at the subclavian vein.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine attenuation values in the central vein and perivenous artefacts at the subclavian vein in cervical CT angiography (CTA) when using 40 ml contrast material (CM) followed by different volumes (25 ml vs 40 ml) of salineflush (SF). METHODS: 61 patients underwent CTA between the aortic arch (AA) and distal to the circle of Willis (cW). After calculating test-bolus time to peak enhancement at the cW (Tc), scanning delay was represented as [(Tc + 4) - scan duration between AA and cW] s. 28 patients (Group A) received 40 ml of 370 mg iodine (I) ml(-1) CM followed by 25 ml of SF, and 33 patients (Group B) received the same CM followed by 40 ml of SF, both administered through the right antecubital vein. Arterial attenuation was measured at seven points in the aorto-carotid artery and at three points in the vertebrobasilar artery. Venous attenuation in the central vein was measured at four points. Mean attenuation values were analysed quantitatively. Axial and post-processing three-dimensional images were assessed qualitatively. RESULTS: When Groups A and B were compared, there were no differences in the mean attenuation values in either the aorto-carotid artery (p=0.78) or the vertebrobasilar artery (p=0.82). Mean venous attenuation values were lower (p=0.002) in Group B than in Group A. Although the qualitative assessment of arterial images showed no differences between the two groups overall, perivenous artefacts at the subclavian vein were assessed as less prominent (p<0.01) in Group B. CONCLUSIONS: When compared with CTA followed by 25 ml of SF, CTA followed by 40 ml of SF can reduce venous attenuation values and perivenous artefacts at the subclavian vein.
Authors: Filippo Cademartiri; Nico Mollet; Aad van der Lugt; Koen Nieman; Peter M T Pattynama; Pim J de Feyter; Gabriel P Krestin Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2003-12-19 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: N Takeyama; Y Ohgiya; H Itokawa; Y Takahashi; M Obuchi; H Shinjyo; S Matsui; T Hayashi; K Kato; T Fujimoto; Y Kinebuchi; T Kitahara; T Gokan Journal: Acta Radiol Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 1.990
Authors: Amit Gupta; Verena Carola Obmann; Michelle Jordan; Simon Lennartz; Markus Michael Obmann; Nils Große Hokamp; David Zopfs; Lenhard Pennig; Gina Fürtjes; Nikhil Ramaiya; Robert Gilkeson; Kai Roman Laukamp Journal: Quant Imaging Med Surg Date: 2021-01
Authors: Eun Ju Ha; Sae Rom Chung; Dong Gyu Na; Hye Shin Ahn; Jin Chung; Ji Ye Lee; Jeong Seon Park; Roh-Eul Yoo; Jung Hwan Baek; Sun Mi Baek; Seong Whi Cho; Yoon Jung Choi; Soo Yeon Hahn; So Lyung Jung; Ji-Hoon Kim; Seul Kee Kim; Soo Jin Kim; Chang Yoon Lee; Ho Kyu Lee; Jeong Hyun Lee; Young Hen Lee; Hyun Kyung Lim; Jung Hee Shin; Jung Suk Sim; Jin Young Sung; Jung Hyun Yoon; Miyoung Choi Journal: Korean J Radiol Date: 2021-10-26 Impact factor: 3.500
Authors: Yu Chen; Huadan Xue; Zheng-yu Jin; Jie Zhang; Hao Sun; Xuan Wang; Zhu-hua Zhang; Da-ming Zhang; Guang-ming Lu; Zhao-qi Zhang; U Joseph Schoepf; Andreas M Bucher; Christopher D Wolla; Yun Wang Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-11-19 Impact factor: 3.240