Literature DB >> 18501539

Current focusing and steering: modeling, physiology, and psychophysics.

Ben H Bonham1, Leonid M Litvak.   

Abstract

Current steering and current focusing are stimulation techniques designed to increase the number of distinct perceptual channels available to cochlear implant (CI) users by adjusting currents applied simultaneously to multiple CI electrodes. Previous studies exploring current steering and current focusing stimulation strategies are reviewed, including results of research using computational models, animal neurophysiology, and human psychophysics. Preliminary results of additional neurophysiological and human psychophysical studies are presented that demonstrate the success of current steering strategies in stimulating auditory nerve regions lying between physical CI electrodes, as well as current focusing strategies that excite regions narrower than those stimulated using monopolar configurations. These results are interpreted in the context of perception and speech reception by CI users. Disparities between results of physiological and psychophysical studies are discussed. The differences in stimulation used for physiological and psychophysical studies are hypothesized to contribute to these disparities. Finally, application of current steering and focusing strategies to other types of auditory prostheses is also discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18501539      PMCID: PMC2562351          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2008.03.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  83 in total

1.  Recruitment of the auditory cortex in congenitally deaf cats by long-term cochlear electrostimulation.

Authors:  R Klinke; A Kral; S Heid; J Tillein; R Hartmann
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-09-10       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Measurement of the electrically evoked compound action potential via a neural response telemetry system.

Authors:  Norbert Dillier; Wai Kong Lai; Bengt Almqvist; Carolin Frohne; Joachim Müller-Deile; Matthias Stecker; Ernst von Wallenberg
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.547

3.  A stochastic model of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve: pulse-train response.

Authors:  I C Bruce; L S Irlicht; M W White; S J O'Leary; S Dynes; E Javel; G M Clark
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  A stochastic model of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve: single-pulse response.

Authors:  I C Bruce; M W White; L S Irlicht; S J O'Leary; S Dynes; E Javel; G M Clark
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Cortical responses to cochlear implant stimulation: channel interactions.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-10-20

6.  The resolution of complex spectral patterns by cochlear implant and normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Belinda A Henry; Christopher W Turner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Electrode configuration influences action potential initiation site and ensemble stochastic response properties.

Authors:  Charles A Miller; Paul J Abbas; Kirill V Nourski; Ning Hu; Barbara K Robinson
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Forward masking in different cochlear implant systems.

Authors:  Colette Boëx; Maria-Izabel Kós; Marco Pelizzone
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Channel interaction in cochlear implant users evaluated using the electrically evoked compound action potential.

Authors:  Paul J Abbas; Michelle L Hughes; Carolyn J Brown; Charles A Miller; Heather South
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.854

10.  Initial evaluation of the Clarion CII cochlear implant: speech perception and neural response imaging.

Authors:  Johan H M Frijns; Jeroen J Briaire; Jan A P M de Laat; Jan J Grote
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  66 in total

1.  A point process framework for modeling electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Joshua H Goldwyn; Jay T Rubinstein; Eric Shea-Brown
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Monopolar intracochlear pulse trains selectively activate the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Matthew C Schoenecker; Ben H Bonham; Olga A Stakhovskaya; Russell L Snyder; Patricia A Leake
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-06-22

3.  Encoding pitch contours using current steering.

Authors:  Xin Luo; David M Landsberger; Monica Padilla; Arthi G Srinivasan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Probing the electrode-neuron interface with focused cochlear implant stimulation.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-06

5.  Partial tripolar cochlear implant stimulation: Spread of excitation and forward masking in the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer; Steven M Bierer; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 6.  Pulse trains to percepts: the challenge of creating a perceptually intelligible world with sight recovery technologies.

Authors:  Ione Fine; Geoffrey M Boynton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Properties of electrically evoked potentials activated by optic nerve stimulation with penetrating electrodes of different modes in rabbits.

Authors:  Pengjia Cao; Jingjing Sun; Yan Yan; Yao Chen; Xinyu Chai; Xiaodong Sun; Qiushi Ren; Liming Li
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Excitation Patterns of Standard and Steered Partial Tripolar Stimuli in Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Ching-Chih Wu; Xin Luo
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-12-21

Review 9.  Neuromodulation for brain disorders: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Matthew D Johnson; Hubert H Lim; Theoden I Netoff; Allison T Connolly; Nessa Johnson; Abhrajeet Roy; Abbey Holt; Kelvin O Lim; James R Carey; Jerrold L Vitek; Bin He
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 4.538

10.  ECAP spread of excitation with virtual channels and physical electrodes.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Lisa J Stille; Jacquelyn L Baudhuin; Jenny L Goehring
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.