Literature DB >> 11572362

Loudness summation for pulsatile electrical stimulation of the cochlea: effects of rate, electrode separation, level, and mode of stimulation.

C M McKay1, M D Remine, H J McDermott.   

Abstract

The aim of these two experiments was to gain systematic data on the amount of loudness summation measured for dual-electrode stimuli with varying temporal and spatial separation of current pulses. Loudness summation is important in the implementation of speech processing strategies for implantees. However, the loudness mapping functions used in current speech processors utilize psychophysical data (thresholds and comfortable loudness levels) derived using single-electrode stimuli, and do not take into account the temporal and spatial patterns of the speech processor output. In the first experiment, the current reduction required to equalize the loudness of a dual-electrode stimulus to that of its component (and equally loud) single-electrode stimuli was measured for three electrode separations (0.75, 2.25, and 7.5 mm), three repetition rates (250, 500, and 1000 Hz), and two loudness levels (comfortably loud, and mid-dynamic range). It was found that electrode separation had little effect on loudness summation, except for interactions with level and rate effects at the smallest separation. More current adjustment (in dB) was required for higher rates and lower levels of stimulation. The second experiment investigated the effects of mode (monopolar versus bipolar) and pulse duration on loudness summation. More current adjustment was required in bipolar mode than in monopolar mode at the lower level only. The main effects in both experiments, and their interactions, are consistent with a loudness model in which the neural excitation density is first obtained by temporal integration of excitation at each cochlear place, then converted to specific loudness via a nonlinear relationship, and finally integrated over cochlear place to obtain the loudness. The two important features which affect the loudness relationships in dual-electrode stimulation in this model are the shape of the excitation density function and the amount by which the neural spike probability per pulse is reduced in areas of overlapping excitation due to refractory effects.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11572362     DOI: 10.1121/1.1394222

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  28 in total

1.  Cortical responses to cochlear implant stimulation: channel interactions.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-10-20

2.  A psychophysical method for measuring spatial resolution in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Mahan Azadpour; Colette M McKay
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-10-15

Review 3.  Probing the electrode-neuron interface with focused cochlear implant stimulation.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-06

4.  Channel Interaction and Current Level Affect Across-Electrode Integration of Interaural Time Differences in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Listeners.

Authors:  Katharina Egger; Piotr Majdak; Bernhard Laback
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-09-16

5.  Encoding and decoding amplitude-modulated cochlear implant stimuli--a point process analysis.

Authors:  Joshua H Goldwyn; Eric Shea-Brown; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 1.621

6.  Investigating the effects of stimulus duration and context on pitch perception by cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Joshua S Stohl; Chandra S Throckmorton; Leslie M Collins
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Amplitude modulation and loudness in cochlear implantees.

Authors:  Colette M McKay; Katherine R Henshall
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-10-02

8.  Effects of stimulus level and rate on psychophysical thresholds for interleaved pulse trains in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Jenny L Goehring; Jacquelyn L Baudhuin; Kendra K Schmid
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  The effect of polarity order and electrode-activation order on loudness in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Ann E Todd; David M Landsberger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Current-level discrimination and spectral profile analysis in multi-channel electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Bernhard Laback; Piotr Majdak; Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.