Literature DB >> 16425088

Loudness adaptation in acoustic and electric hearing.

Qing Tang1, Sheng Liu, Fan-Gang Zeng.   

Abstract

The present study is aimed to evaluate and compare loudness adaptation between normal hearing and cochlear-implant subjects. Loudness adaptation for 367-s pure tones was measured in five normal-hearing subjects at three frequencies (125, 1,000, and 8,000 Hz) and three levels (30, 60, and 90 dB SPL). In addition, loudness adaptation for 367-s pulse trains was measured in five Clarion cochlear-implant subjects at three stimulation rates (100, 991, and 4,296 Hz), three levels (10, 50, and 90% of the electric dynamic range), three stimulation positions (apical, middle and basal), and two stimulation modes (monopolar and bipolar). The method of successive magnitude estimation was used to quantify loudness adaptation. Similar to the previous results, we found that loudness adaptation in normal-hearing subjects increases with decreasing level and increasing frequency. However, we also found a small but significant loudness enhancement at 90 dB SPL in acoustic hearing. Despite large individual variability, we found that loudness adaptation in cochlear-implant subjects increases with decreasing levels, but is not significantly affected by the rate, place and mode of stimulation. A phenomenological model was proposed to predict loudness adaptation as a function of stimulus frequency and level in acoustic hearing. The present results were not fully compatible with either the restricted excitation hypothesis or the neural adaptation hypothesis. Loudness adaptation may have a central component that is dependent on the peripheral excitation pattern.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16425088      PMCID: PMC2504588          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-005-0023-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  38 in total

1.  Effects of phase duration and electrode separation on loudness growth in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  M Chatterjee; Q J Fu; R V Shannon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Tone decay at threshold with auditory electrical stimulation in digisonic cochlear implantees.

Authors:  J Wable; B Frachet; S Gallégo
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct

3.  Tone decay for hearing-impaired listeners with and without dead regions in the cochlea.

Authors:  Martina Huss; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Electrode configuration influences action potential initiation site and ensemble stochastic response properties.

Authors:  Charles A Miller; Paul J Abbas; Kirill V Nourski; Ning Hu; Barbara K Robinson
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Dynamic range enhancement for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Robert S Hong; Jay T Rubinstein; Dan Wehner; David Horn
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 6.  A MODEL OF LOUDNESS SUMMATION.

Authors:  E ZWICKER; B SCHARF
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1965-01       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: dependence on electrode configuration.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: coding of stimulus channel and current level.

Authors:  John C Middlebrooks; Julie Arenberg Bierer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Cochlear implants: is there any relationship between stimulation rates and adaptation?

Authors:  G Sennaroglu; L Sennaroglu; E E Yucel; E Belgin
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Electrical suppression of tinnitus with high-rate pulse trains.

Authors:  Jay T Rubinstein; Richard S Tyler; Abigail Johnson; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.311

View more
  10 in total

1.  Amplitude modulation reduces loudness adaptation to high-frequency tones.

Authors:  Dwight P Wynne; Sahara E George; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Tinnitus suppression by low-rate electric stimulation and its electrophysiological mechanisms.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng; Qing Tang; Andrew Dimitrijevic; Arnold Starr; Jannine Larky; Nikolas H Blevins
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Coding of electric pulse trains presented through cochlear implants in the auditory midbrain of awake rabbit: comparison with anesthetized preparations.

Authors:  Yoojin Chung; Kenneth E Hancock; Sung-Il Nam; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Temporary suppression of tinnitus by modulated sounds.

Authors:  Kelly M Reavis; Vanessa S Rothholtz; Qing Tang; Jeff A Carroll; Hamid Djalilian; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-04-19

5.  Gap Detection in School-Age Children and Adults: Center Frequency and Ramp Duration.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Heather L Porter; Joseph W Hall; John H Grose
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Loudness adaptation accompanying ribbon synapse and auditory nerve disorders.

Authors:  Dwight P Wynne; Fan-Gang Zeng; Shrutee Bhatt; Henry J Michalewski; Andrew Dimitrijevic; Arnold Starr
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 13.501

7.  Tinnitus suppression by electric stimulation of the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Janice E Chang; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-29

Review 8.  Tinnitus what and where: an ecological framework.

Authors:  Grant D Searchfield
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 4.003

9.  Tinnitus Treatment Using Noninvasive and Minimally Invasive Electric Stimulation: Experimental Design and Feasibility.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng; Matthew Richardson; Phillip Tran; Harrison Lin; Hamid Djalilian
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  Human Sensation of Transcranial Electric Stimulation.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng; Phillip Tran; Matthew Richardson; Shuping Sun; Yuchen Xu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.