Literature DB >> 19495879

Spatial and temporal effects of interleaved masking in cochlear implants.

Bom Jun Kwon1, Chris van den Honert.   

Abstract

Modern cochlear implants utilize interleaved presentation of pulses on different electrodes to avoid physical interference among multiple current fields, yet neural interaction still exists. In the present study, masking was examined with four Nucleus24 users with the banded electrode array in an interleaved masking paradigm, where a probe stimulus was interleaved with a masker stimulus. Spatial and temporal aspects of masking were addressed by fixing the masker at the middle of the electrode array and changing the location of the probe and by testing various stimulation rates: 125, 500, 2,000, and 6,410 Hz. In addition, growth of masking (GOM) was assessed by changing the masker level in six steps. Results indicated that masking patterns were generally much wider, regardless of stimulation rate, than those in acoustic hearing. The amount of masking decreased from the peak at the rate of approximately 0.5 dB/mm even at the highest masker level. The pattern of GOM with the rates higher than 500 Hz was different from that observed in previous masking studies, characterized by markedly shallow growth at low masker levels or overall shallow growth. A facilitating effect of the masker (lowering the threshold) was suspected, except for the 125-Hz condition, due to the fibers that were subliminally excited, but not discharged, by the masker with local perturbations of membrane potentials, and were subsequently discharged easily by a lower level probe when the temporal gap between masker and probe was sufficiently short. These results suggest that both refractory characteristics of neurons and neural summation be considered in interleaved stimulation of pulses at high, but clinically relevant, stimulation rates. Overall, the present masking study might provide a basis for models in psychophysics and speech understanding in current cochlear implant systems utilizing high-rate interleaved stimulation.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19495879      PMCID: PMC3084388          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-009-0168-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  23 in total

1.  Psychophysical recovery from single-pulse forward masking in electric hearing.

Authors:  D A Nelson; G S Donaldson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Cortical responses to cochlear implant stimulation: channel interactions.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-10-20

3.  The resolution of complex spectral patterns by cochlear implant and normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Belinda A Henry; Christopher W Turner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Forward masking in different cochlear implant systems.

Authors:  Colette Boëx; Maria-Izabel Kós; Marco Pelizzone
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effects of cochlear-implant pulse rate and inter-channel timing on channel interactions and thresholds.

Authors:  John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Forward-masked spatial tuning curves in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  David A Nelson; Gail S Donaldson; Heather Kreft
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Two-tone unmasking and suppression in a forward-masking situation.

Authors:  R V Shannon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.

Authors:  H Levitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Forward masking as a function of frequency, masker level, and signal delay.

Authors:  W Jesteadt; S P Bacon; J R Lehman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Auditory prostheses research with multiple channel intracochlear stimulation in man.

Authors:  D K Eddington; W H Dobelle; D E Brackmann; M G Mladejovsky; J L Parkin
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1978 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.547

View more
  3 in total

1.  Sentence recognition in noise promoting or suppressing masking release by normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.

Authors:  Bomjun J Kwon; Trevor T Perry; Cassie L Wilhelm; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effects of stimulus level and rate on psychophysical thresholds for interleaved pulse trains in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Jenny L Goehring; Jacquelyn L Baudhuin; Kendra K Schmid
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  Procedural Factors That Affect Psychophysical Measures of Spatial Selectivity in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Stefano Cosentino; John M Deeks; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 3.293

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.