Literature DB >> 1420058

Tono-Pen tonometry in normal and in post-keratoplasty eyes.

O Geyer1, Y Mayron, A Loewenstein, M Neudorfer, L Rothkoff, M Lazar.   

Abstract

Oculab Tono-Pen tonometry was compared with Goldmann applanation tonometry in 82 eyes of 82 patients with normal corneas and in 54 eyes of 54 patients who had undergone penetrating keratoplasty and whose corneas did not preclude the use of Goldmann tonometer. We found that the intraocular pressure (IOP) in 48% of the eyes with normal corneas and in 57% after keratoplasty has different measurements with Goldmann and Tono-Pen pressures of 3 mm Hg or more. Despite the correlation between the Goldmann tonometer and the Tono-Pen in the group of eyes with normal corneas (r = 0.83) as well as in the group of eyes after keratoplasty (r = 0.79) the Tono-Pen tended to significantly overestimate the Goldmann tonometer reading (p < 0.0001). The mean difference between the two instruments was highest across the lower IOP range (< 9 mm Hg) in the group of eyes after keratoplasty. Because the mean absolute values of the paired differences between Goldmann and Tono-Pen measurements varied significantly across all IOP intervals it was not possible to establish a correction factor which could be used when comparing the two measurements. Based on this study the Tono-Pen consistently overestimated the actual IOP in an unpredictable manner. Where possible Goldmann measurements of the IOP are still to be preferred.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1420058      PMCID: PMC504344          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.76.9.538

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  4 in total

1.  Accuracy and precision of the Tono-Pen in measuring intraocular pressure after keratoplasty and epikeratophakia and in scarred corneas.

Authors:  D S Rootman; M S Insler; H W Thompson; J Parelman; D Poland; S R Unterman
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1988-12

2.  Comparison of the Tono-Pen to the Goldmann applanation tonometer.

Authors:  R E Frenkel; Y J Hong; D H Shin
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1988-06

3.  Clinical evaluation of the Oculab Tono-Pen.

Authors:  D S Minckler; G Baerveldt; D K Heuer; B Quillen-Thomas; A F Walonker; J Weiner
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1987-08-15       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Clinical comparison of the Oculab Tono-Pen to the Goldmann applanation tonometer.

Authors:  S F Kao; P R Lichter; T J Bergstrom; S Rowe; D C Musch
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 12.079

  4 in total
  13 in total

1.  A comparison of four methods of tonometry: method agreement and interobserver variability.

Authors:  P-A Tonnu; T Ho; K Sharma; E White; C Bunce; D Garway-Heath
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Comparison of IOP measurement using GAT and DCT in patients with penetrating keratoplasties.

Authors:  A R Ismail; M Lamont; S Perera; D Khan-Lim; R Mehta; J D A Macleod; D F Anderson
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Tono-Pen determination of intraocular pressure in patients with band keratopathy or glued cornea.

Authors:  A Azuara-Blanco; T K Bhojani; A R Sarhan; C T Pillai; H S Dua
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 4.  Tonometers-which one should I use?

Authors:  Kanza Aziz; David S Friedman
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Comparative evaluation of TonoPen AVIA, Goldmann applanation tonometry and non-contact tonometry.

Authors:  Shibal Bhartiya; Shveta Jindal Bali; Reetika Sharma; Neha Chaturvedi; Tanuj Dada
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 2.031

6.  Comparison between methods of tonometry: time for a change of approach.

Authors:  K Holtedahl; T Christoffersen; T Fors; U Ringberg
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Tono-Pen tonometry.

Authors:  P Beaumont; K Kang
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Clinical comparison of the ProTon and Tono-Pen tonometers with the Goldmann applanation tonometer.

Authors:  A Midelfart; A Wigers
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Intraocular pressure measurement after penetrating keratoplasty: minified Goldmann applanation tonometer, pneumatonometer, and Tono-Pen versus manometry.

Authors:  M J Ménage; P L Kaufman; M A Croft; S P Landay
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  The effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurement in patients with corneal pathology.

Authors:  A C Browning; A Bhan; A P Rotchford; S Shah; H S Dua
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.638

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.