Literature DB >> 7819170

Clinical comparison of the ProTon and Tono-Pen tonometers with the Goldmann applanation tonometer.

A Midelfart1, A Wigers.   

Abstract

A clinical evaluation of a new electron ProTon tonometer was performed comparing the values of intraocular pressure (IOP) measured using this instrument with those determined by a similar instrument, Tono-Pen XL, and by Goldmann applanation tonometry. The mean IOP measured in 106 eyes with the ProTon tonometer was not significantly different from that determined with Goldmann applanation, while the IOP values measured with Tono-Pen XL were significantly lower. The 95% limits of agreement between applanation tonometry and ProTon tonometry were between -4 mm Hg and 5 mm Hg and between applanation tonometry and Tono-Pen XL tonometry between -3 mm Hg and 8 mm Hg. The ProTon tonometer appears to have a higher level of accuracy than the Tono-Pen XL tonometer in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7819170      PMCID: PMC504987          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.78.12.895

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  17 in total

1.  Clinical evaluation of the Oculab Tono-Pen.

Authors:  E J Higginbotham
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1988-01-15       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  Assessment of intraocular pressure in vitrectomized gas-containing eyes. A clinical and manometric comparison of the Tono-Pen to the pneumotonometer.

Authors:  J I Lim; N P Blair; E J Higginbotham; M D Farber; W E Shaw; B R Garretson
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1990-05

3.  An evaluation of the Tono-Pen for the measurement of diurnal intraocular pressure.

Authors:  S M Farrar; K N Miller; M B Shields; C M Stoup
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1989-04-15       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Oculab Tono-Pen, Goldmann applanation tonometry, and pneumatic tonometry for intraocular pressure assessment in gas-filled eyes.

Authors:  M W Hines; B F Jost; K L Fogelman
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1988-08-15       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements with the Oculab Tono-Pen vs manometry in humans shortly after death.

Authors:  V Hessemer; R Rössler; K W Jacobi
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1988-06-15       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  [Experimental study of the seromuscular pedicle flap graft in repair of large bile duct defects].

Authors:  Q F Pen; R T Ran; X Y Yao
Journal:  Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  1988-02

7.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Evaluation of the Tono-Pen 2 and the X-Pert noncontact tonometers in cataract surgery.

Authors:  P Denis; J P Nordmann; V Bertin; J M Gayraud; L Laroche; H Saraux
Journal:  Ophthalmologica       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.250

9.  The Tono-Pen. A manometric and clinical study.

Authors:  W A Boothe; D A Lee; W C Panek; T H Pettit
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1988-09

10.  Clinical comparison of the Oculab Tono-Pen to the Goldmann applanation tonometer.

Authors:  S F Kao; P R Lichter; T J Bergstrom; S Rowe; D C Musch
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 12.079

View more
  5 in total

1.  A comparison of four methods of tonometry: method agreement and interobserver variability.

Authors:  P-A Tonnu; T Ho; K Sharma; E White; C Bunce; D Garway-Heath
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Tono-Pen determination of intraocular pressure in patients with band keratopathy or glued cornea.

Authors:  A Azuara-Blanco; T K Bhojani; A R Sarhan; C T Pillai; H S Dua
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Efficacy of TonoLab in detecting physiological and pharmacological changes in rat intraocular pressure: comparison of TonoPen and microneedle manometry.

Authors:  Masaaki Ohashi; Makoto Aihara; Tadashiro Saeki; Makoto Araie
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  Intraocular Pressure Measurement Using Ocular Response Analyzer, Dynamic Contour Tonometer, and Scheimpflug Analyzer Corvis ST.

Authors:  Lisa Ramm; Robert Herber; Eberhard Spoerl; Frederik Raiskup; Lutz E Pillunat; Naim Terai
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 1.909

5.  Comparative intraocular pressure measurements using three different rebound tonometers through in an ex vivo analysis and clinical trials in canine eyes.

Authors:  Jaeho Shim; Seonmi Kang; Yoonji Park; Sunhyo Kim; Seokmin Go; Eunji Lee; Kangmoon Seo
Journal:  Vet Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 1.644

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.